If not of his mind's perfect design, and/or if snubbed by not getting the "improved" design used, he might make such claims. Dunno he could have a character flaw, or have some musguided guilt thing going on (or he could have a legit complaint, but then of what magnitude the concern).
It may not be the perfect trigger, if so then that could be deemed "flawed" but then any product of any error, in design or in manufacuring, or even dumbarsed public usage, could be deemed "flawed".
Until you make guns perfectly idiot proof, all designs will be "flawed".
That's the way the lawyers are pushing for it I bet.
I for one am super annoyed at Ruger for putting warning labels on their barrels, or for Smith using "lawyer locks" and for Colt using the crappy series 80 safety system.
There is a LOT of hype on this subject, seen some of it on this thread. Less than scientific study of events, knee jerk reactions and the immediate trasnfer of info.........without employing factual detail filters............adds to the mess.
Not saying 700 triggers might not be bad once in a while, in factory state, or that they over time may not experience an issue, with no contamination or wear problem.
If so it'd be hard to prove, what with all the variables.
I suspect that if there is a true problem it is much much smaller than what is being put forth.
As for experts and the weight of their testimony.
A freakin ton of experts thought the current President was gonna be the next Messiah.
Bet those gusy are wrong, and many of them students of politics/social studies and truly heartfelt their comments.
One can be knowledgeable, of good character and still be wrong.
I want experimental statistical proof.
Until then I aint buying it, but will keep all my guns pointed safe