Bottom line: I prefer scientific arguments.
People can trust or not trust the trigger, for whatever reasons they want.
They don't have to be based on truth or science to be good enough of a reason for their personal choice.
But if somebody is going to point a finger and make definitive claims, they darn well better be able to back it up....with real data, not some bullcrap incident rate of unproven exact fault.
And it looks like a lot of people can't (here or in the courtroom).
I still say with the popularity of sniper movies, documentaries and games, mixed with the current political climate.............that the left is hyping a miniscule issue at best, to demonize the most poplar bolt gun (since it falls outside of previous assault rifle bans).
I don't trust anything, new or used.
I'm suspect of any rifle, but due to popularity (and the ability of adjustment) I am suspect of used Remingtons more.
Not out of some design issue, but out of people issues.
Really, shouldn't the stupid folks who can't keep the muzzle pointed in a safe direction just spill hot coffee at the drivethrough on their crotches and get their 15 minutes of fame (and millions)?