I don’t think anybody here suggested that we (“we”, as in anyone that has to deal in only private land access, not a certain US State of “we”) care what it looks like from the outside looking in. We are just trying to explain the facts. We don’t expect you to understand when all you have is public land access. Since many of you don't have any experience in it, we are just stating that it is bad news for those of us that aren't money bags to have others pay for coyote hunting access. You giving an opinion on it makes as much sense as me giving opinions on whether you should be screwed out of your public ground by it being sold to private landowners. Like you say…why should you care if someone pays to kick me off? That’s understandable, I guess, that you don’t care. Well why should I care if you can’t hunt on your public land tomorrow? I don’t. But I’ll bet you that you’d do what you could to avoid it.
Someone will say “Well, it’s their land, they can do what they please.” Yep! Exactly! They aren’t stupid! I know that. I am not saying that. I’m just saying I want to be as far away from assisting them in figuring it out.
Now, to the point of guides that has come up multiple times without an answer. I was hoping someone else would answer this. LOL
At the risk of ticking off a few very respectable guides (and maybe even a few I could care less about), let me step as lightly into that question as I know how. Some won't agree and some will get feathers ruffled, but here goes.
I actually partly agree with some of what has been said regarding comparing guided coyote hunts to paying landowners. I think both can be and have been harmful. However, there is a major difference. So, to answer the question, the difference in my opinion is landowner perception/landowner relations/landowner point of view. Someone going straight to a landowner and offering money to kill coyotes is bad for private land hunting. It is bad for my future, your future, and our kids' future. When you choose to pay landowners, you are going straight to everybody’s source with your money. It affects the weekend warriors, the predator control guys, the fur hunters, dads with their kids going out to make a few stands, the people who gain free access, guides, even other future paying hunters.
On the other hand, when you pay a guide, the landowner may or may not get dollar-vision, so the affect is not as direct and certain.
Sometimes, however, they do see guiding on their land as money opportunities, and even some others are just rubbed the wrong way by it if they catch wind of it. Same with the video guys and the hunting contests on that private land. I did not say ALL landowners, maybe not even a majority at this point in time, but some. I'm not jumping on sides, I'm just telling the way I see it, and why I personally will never do any of it. Maybe the landowners that have expressed that to me were off their rockers. LOL I don't know. Maybe this makes me unpopular too, but the question came up and that’s my take on it.
And, others will call me selfish. Someone will ask me if I've ever bought a coyote video, or a foxpro, or this product, or that product, or ask if I have ever boastfully posted a kill photo on the public internet, or even sold some fur to the fur buyer. And to my "Yes, sure I have" answer, they will respond, "Well then you're just as bad for predator hunting!!" I hear ya!! Loud and clear! Dang, life's a b**ch! It's sort of a no-win situation. Because, as has been said, it will become a money game at some point, if not already. Point taken, but opinions differ on what we consider harmful, and I don't have to go down with my boots off.