Gentlemen...history has many different trends in our outdoor sports. Hunting ,trapping ,fishing. Trapping generally follows the price trends of furs. Fishing has seen people go from catching something for supper to tournaments for bass ,walleye, ect. The cost of being guided to fish on lakes and steams is a business of its own. Hunting deer with lets say bow and arrow as well as muzzel loader has seen huge changes with the technology developments . Predator hunting is supposed to be one of the fastest increasing hunting types in popularity at this time. As people have asked to have permission from land owners for the privalige of fishing , hunting ,ect on their lands, the increase of people participating in these activities has ment people losing their place to do their "thing" to family, relatives ,friends,ect. So the old time fix was to offer the landowner some kind of gift of either part of the game taken (rabbits,pheasants, quail, fish, ect. to offering to help the landowner fix fence, repairs on the property ect. to keep their status as sole user of the land for their interests. Then it was more time efficient to just offer money for this instead of the time investment of helping the landowner. I also have heard it from land owners when I was asking for permission to trap that promises from previous trappers to either help them or spend time and effort to remove problem animals from near their house or barns , were not fulfilled . Land owners don't like broken promises of any kind. Some farmers would allow anyone asking for permission to hunt or trap to "go right ahead" and then you had competition on "your" own areas from others. So the need to be exclusive came to be. How to do this??? Money made the land owner responsible to you by not letting others also use the area for your intentions but still allowed ,let's say bowhunters to use the same area you are trapping....then you checking your traps messed up his area for his purposes and his to some extent ,yours. Then it is "total exclusive use rights" time and usually more money to exclude even more " users" of the land. Kind of where we are now...more in some parts of our world than others and constant changes in particular sports as they become more and less popular. One benefit is that usually the ones spending the money take some "ownership" in the land and resources , usually for their benefit , but also with positive improvements in wildlife numbers,quality of animals ,nutrition for many game and non game animals in the area with food plots and added food and minerals. We are all part of the mix in this world...the ones that will never pay to hunt, those that do , those that will start , and those that say it isn't worth it and quit. Things will change and some times this come full circle and some things never return. Did any of us ever 20 years ago think we would pay for a bottle of water or pay for TV programing??? It is not right ,but some did and then others and now most. Does it make it wrong? Who knows but it is status quo now so go figure. The paying does exclude one to improve the experience of another...as the price gets too high, it will not be paid and when predators get too thick , hunters will be asked or paid to remove or control them. When all is going good , the hunting goes to the highest bidder or to those who choose to become land owners. We all have a part in this drama and the curtains still up and no fat lady in sight. SM