Originally Posted By: Winny FanOriginally Posted By: duckdogOriginally Posted By: TripleDeuce660In my mind there is only one bible of ethics for any hunter. YOUR STATES HUNTING REGULATIONS. So long as you are not breaking the law it is fine by me. They allow you to kill feral cats because wildlife biologists have determined them to be damaging the ecosystem. Cats are an invasive species.
Hunters need to stick together and not judge each others ethics or the anti's will divide and conquer. No laws broken, no harm done.
I've never quite understood this train of thought...
Myself, I've never needed the government to tell me the difference between right or wrong. Just because your "bible of ethics" (roll eyes here), says something is legal or illegal in your state, does NOT mean you have to agree with it. (Ethically)
And I'm not just singling you out. I see this quite often. In one breath a guy will say "The government says this, or says that, and I think it's total BS!"
But in the next breath, when something is questioned,..."It's legal so it's ok".
People should think for themselves...
I could list several activities that are legal according to our "bible of ethics", that I'm sure you'd find questionable. I do.
And just because they're legal, doesn't mean I have to agree with them.
P.S.... My dog loves cats...he just can't eat a whole one by himself.
Good post, IMO, duckdog.
LOL..!! It must be a slow day when the only thing a group of great white hunters can discus is cat killing.
Cat's is fun...
But you don't wanna talk about killing cats in California, you get life or possibly the death penalty. In fact you have to watch what's said on the internet or you'll have a visitor.
I use words like "allegedly", or "I heard".