zapper223 wrote -
But the kill while I enjoy shooting is anticlimactic.(probably spelled wrong). and anyone who is NOT out for a clean , quick kill ought to stick to targets. I have a respect for all living things even those I hunt.
Buddy the reason started this post is for MY style of hunting, I believe the .223 is unethical for ME, thats why I started this post, to see if any other Eastern hunters shared my reservation about the .223 Remington. It seems more than a few do.
Until I went to the .223, really had no problems. You seem to have alot of knowledge on the subject, how many coyote (not deer) kills do you have in the woods? Not many I bet /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/wink.gif
Yes, bullet construction does matter with the .223, as I have found by shooting coyotes with it (not Deer). Big SP's do work best, but I will get X amount of lost dogs when woods hunting period. Shot from 40 grain Vmaxes to 60 grain SP's. The X amount of coyotes that run, seems very high comparing the .223 to .243.
If you took the time to read my whole post, I have stated at least 2 or 3 times that the .223 will kill fine on chest shots.
As far as .223 on whitetail, sure. Same as coyotes, shoot 'em in the chest they die nice, shoot 'em just a little off, and you have a long day on your hands.
But when I hunt here in New England, in these thick woods, I will only call on an average 15 to 20 dogs a year. When he arrives I want him dead now, at whatever angle
Waiting for a perfect shot here means you will rarely pull the trigger. I hunt to kill coyotes, not to watch them trot by with me waiting with my thumb up my butt for your "ethical shot"