Cheney whupped the redheaded stepchild!!

The previous Cheney/Edwards meeting were so forgetable, that even Edwards couldn't remember if or when he might have met Cheney before.

Don't you think that he would have disputed Cheney's remarks at the time if he could have?

He had to go back and have someone else tell him when it was. I can see why Cheney didn't remember, and even though they were in the same venue, they still may not have formally met. If I acknowledge you from the podium in a crowded setting, does than mean I "met" you? Not necessarily.
 
hunterbug,
KyCoyote Hunter, you must have missed my previous post so I will restate it for you. I will also add a few things for you to think about.

1. Haliburton is the only company capible of handeling the dutythat the contract called for. So what is the point of wasting time that they didn't have holding open bids when noone else can deliver?

Who dont you look at who sets the standards on determining who is capable or incapable of doing the job. Is it concicidence that its the Bush administration who came to this conclusion? I think not.
 
Rational Americans: Gather facts look at both sides gives an honest opinions with detailed information.

Irrational Americans: refuse to look at the facts and accept them even after detailed reports show the truths. I have to admit they are hard to accept, stomach even. But never the less they are the TRUT.
 
I read the article on yahoo. They are investigating EVERYONE! They are doing this for the simple purpose to not appear biased or unfair. The fact that they are investigating is meaningless unless it actually shows something. Now, you weakly responded to 1 of my 10 points. Were you going to respond to the other 9 or simply pretend that they were not there?
 
Once again I'm growing tired of this but here is my attempt at translating. Notice the translations still have no point.
-------------------------------------------------

"Gather facts look at both sides gives an honest opinions with detailed information."

How many punctuations are missing from that statement? I have no idea what we are supposed to derive from this.
--------------------------------------------------
"But never the less they are the TRUT."

I've met people who can't handle the truth, but rarely one who can't spell it.
-------------------------------------------------

"A trut(?) is sort of like a strut. Its (It's) same (Delete same) purpse(?) is to support something!! Though(t) (Y)u(o) may like that JRB (Jrb)."
-------------------------------------------------

" Who dont (don't) you look at who sets the standards on determining who is capable"--->
Is there an owl in here? I know my head is spinning.
-------------------------------------------------

My advice; continue to cut and paste but don't modify it in attempts to sound educated. Then you should copy and paste your post into Microsoft Word for spellchecking before copying it back to submit. We'd love to smear your "theories" or "points" but we just can't seem to dig them out of the filth you post. Good luck.
 
Hunterbug in response to 2- 9,

2. I really don't care about any link between osama and sadam. They are both pieces of crap and need to be exterminated like you would a rabid dog.

3. Maby Cheney was mistaken that he had "never" met Edwards but it is of note that in 3 1/2 years as the senate president that they have only met twice and not while conducting senate business. If that's the best that the kerry campaign can come up with is that the met at a breakfast 3 years ago that's pretty pathetic.

4. I would prefer to have someone that did not fulfill his reserve obligation than someone that turned on his fellow troops and attacked them. kerry should have been recalled to active duty and prosicuted for deriliction of duty. Heck, I would prefer to have a draft dodger. At least with them you knew exactly where they stood and had the courage of their conviction to stand up for what they belived in. Not stabbing our military in the back.

5. Again I will refer you back to my previous post that you appear to have missed. There is a reason for the war in Iraq. No we did not find the WMDs that even the u.n. chief weapons inspector Hans Blix thought were there, but it must be nice as an Iraqi citizen to not have to worry about being shoved into a wood chopper of being forced to watch as your daughter is thrown off of a building.

6. You may recall a little bill about 5 years back called the North American Free Trade Agreement. This bill allows companys to build things in Mexico and bring them over to the United States tax free. So a company can close it's plant in the U.S. and start making the product in Mexico where the labor is alot cheeper and sell it for the same price here and pocket the difference. That had a huge impact on the American economy. And just in case you didn't know, this bill was signed by bill clinton.

7. I don't know how well you follow these things but the economy was heading down hill during the last year of the Klinton administration. Bush and Cheney took over as captians of a sinking ship and are managing to bail out some of the water.

8. Do you think that possibly the 9/11 attackes had a negitive impact of the economy? Or are you going to blame thoes on Bush too?

9. More Americans now own their own home than at any other time in history. I make about 2 dollars an hour more now than I did when Bush took office. So my economical situation has improved. I also see help wanted signs all over the place and thousands of help wanted adds in the news paper. So anyone that doesn't have a job doesn't want one very badly.

10. Part of the damage done to our economy was done by companies like Enron and Adelphia. Yes they were cought during the Bush administration but these acts were comited during the Klinton administration. Maby if janet reno hadn't been so busy snatching little kids and turning them over to communist governments or burning them alive she would have cought these people on her watch.

Point 2, how can u not care you posted here didnt you? You should care becasue this is the whole reason we went to Iraq in the first place, WMD's and a supposed link to Bin Laden. Everyone knew Saddam was an evil dictator and has for more than 20 years yet no one choose to deal with it.

Point 3, Like I said pretty pathetic Edwards only showed up for 33 out of 36 senate meetings.

Point 4, Wasnt about Clinton, wasnt about not serving at all, it was about having an obligation and not fulfilling it. Kerry served his time and admirably as the record shows as Bush even stated! We know where Bush stood to during the Vietnam war, Not beside his fellow airman in nam.
Which goes straight to the charcters of the two men.

Point 5, Again refer to point 2, we have known for years that Saddam was an evil pric. After Bush Rumsfield has failed in selling the war based on WMD's they know say it is a war fought to liberate a nation in sufurage, Come on!

Point 6, Yes I do know and it wasnt 5 years ago Try 10 years ago. The current president is trying to follow in the footsteps of Bill Clinton. Unsucessfully I might add. Look at who is for outsoucing and free trade, Its Bush not Kerry!!

Nafta http://www.fas.usda.gov/info/factsheets/nafta.html
Free Trade [url=Standppointhttp://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/5993610/
 
JRB,
Not my theories! Is it coincidence that it is what put Kerry ahead of Bush in the polls once again. I think not! When Kerry gets a chance to speak the truth, trut or whatever, they seem to be very receptive to it dont u think. People arnt blind JRB they see who is telling the truth.

OH jrb u may wana have your eyes checked! The reason you may not be seeing any deer, yotes could very well mean ur eyesite is failing you.

I think however your eye site is fine I think you must be a direct disendent of Bush and inherited some his arrogance and stubborness to look at reality!!!

u continually to ratchet up your attacks on my spelling, Reason, your theories, your man, your belief is proving to be a falsity. I can see why u use those attacks directed toward me to vent your frustrations and divert the issues at hand. Its ok JRB, I got broad shoulders bring um on, but it is bad to remain in constant denail it has proven to be very unhealthy. As will be told Nov 3 for the president!!
 
KY...I get tired of pablum-puking, limpwristed, bed-wetting liberals like yourself..

Why don't you do some real research and you'll find out that Halliburton has been the contractor of choice since WELL BEFORE BUSH! Go back to the Clinton administration, then keep looking...

You guys have no plan and are just trying to throw enough chaff into the air to keep everybody confused from the real issues.

No plan=No win in 11-04!
 
What the hell are you talking about me being blind for? Where did that come from? You have no point, you made no point, you can't spell and if you could I'm not sure we'd be able to derive a point from your posts. That is MY POINT.

Nobody can dispute that Kerry is gaining in the polls, of corse it was suspected well before the first debate ever took place because by merely walking on stage with the president he suddenly becomes "presidential looking" to the american people. It has been long said that Bush doesn't have to WIN any of the debates, only keep it honest until november.

And NO the american people did not see who was "telling the TRUT" they saw who was "talking the talk" and Kerry has been doing that very well for 20-30 years now. Nobody knows John Kerry, nobody knows John Kerry's beliefs and they don't have time to learn before November. My guess is that George W. Bush will spend a little time telling the American people how John Kerry has voted and they won't like that.
 
Originally posted by KyCoyoteHunter:
[qb]well we will see about that 11-04 pile opps pyle, now wont we!! Well GOOOOLEEEEE[/qb]
And that is your attempt at instigation?

Something resembling a shread of intelligence and an opposing political belief could insight a riot in here and all you can come up with is "Gollleee"???

Does your mother know you spend this much time online? If she does she is probably hoping you're looking at pornography in hopes it would boost you toward manhood. /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/confused.gif
 
Originally posted by Stu Farish:
[qb]Geez, I thought you guys had this figured out the last time around...[/qb]
What else are we gonna do? Season is 9 days away here! :rolleyes: /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/laugh.gif
 
Boy KY, you cut me to the quick... In my 40years of life I've never heard a joke like *that* before. HAHA!!

I bet you're a youngun and have never heard of Ernie Pyle have you? That should be some worthwhile research for ya...

And yes, we shall see come November. I will however, point out that whoever wins the election will not determine who was telling the truth! We all know Clinton was a lying, draft-dodging, womanizing crook who lied quite well-nonetheless, he did get elected... However, I don't think the American people have been quite so fooled by the Johns!

One thing is for sure though...CHENEY WHUPPED THAT RED-HEADED, CANDY STEALIN', SMARMY LITTLE STEPCHILD!!! YEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEHAAAAAAA! Hope you don't mind my Howard Dean impression...
 
only keep it honest until november, Honesty huh!!

HOnestly JRB, you still believe Bush is being honest? The majority of the American people are seeing the misleading information about the reasoning for going to Iraq to begin with not to mention HIS administrations failure to properly supply or troops with not only the equipment they need but the man power to get the job done.

And after Friday and his third debate when Kerry lays out what Bush plan has done to the seniors in the country in terms of social security and health care you will see along with a great many others how Bush failures are viewed in our country.

It was well know JRB, that before the 1 st debate, that the President was only expected to make a strong and viable point to the American people that debate has already past and we see who THE CLEAR WINNER WAS.
Anaylst were predicting way before the first debate that Bush only had the first debate to look forward to. Because his economic policy was agenda was far short of producing viable employment numbers and economic stimulis.



Bush backers are waiting for that magic wand to wave and for a miraculous come back to take hold. Guys guess what your ridding a wet, washed out horse.
 
the whole reason we went to Iraq in the first place, WMD's and a supposed link to Bin Laden. Everyone knew Saddam was an evil dictator and has for more than 20 years yet no one choose to deal with it.
KCH- that is where you and most other dissenters seem to miss the boat.

We went over there because Bush said that we are finally going to do what we say we are going to do. We had been attacked, and wanted to show anyone else who might have been thinking about doing it, or harbouring those that had (or would)that we mean business.

You yourself say no one was willing to deal with it, yet blame Bush for dealing with it. Talk about a FLIP FLOP. State your opinion and then go on to support it. It is typical that you say one thing, and in the very next breath oppose it. That is what you candidate is doing. It is difficult for you to know what you believe since Kerry keeps changing it for you.

The very UN that Kerry says he is so high on, is the very same UN that made 16 resolutions that said "Stop that or we are going to come over there and make you".

If I constantly tell my kids "stop that or I'm going to whip your butt", and then never do anything to back it up, do you think they are going to mind me or respect me?
 
JRB
Listen to stu,
Isnt it supper yet!!!
HA HA

When faced with opposition you get angry which blurs the issues at hand. Hmm who does this sound like?

my first deer kill with a bow worth a million bucks, JRB's face when he reads my posts priceless!!!
 
Back
Top