Originally Posted By: FurhunterI like how the pro side of this argument always states how well it works with the caveat of keeping the range short and good marksmanship with perfect shot placement. In a sport such as this that all happens very little.
I think its similar to elk hunting with a 243. Sure it's legal and it will work but is it truly the best tool for the job... Probably not, its like going to the field with one arm tied behind your back limiting your range and shots available to you. Same can be said for this 17WSM and I think that's where the basis of these arguments stem. The round, while impressive doesn't have what it takes in less than perfect situations which happen all the time. Those that have been doing this for a while can admit it and those that are trying to justify a purchase cannot.
Proper shot placement goes with any small caliber cartridge.
If you are into spending time with a needle and fishing line, or losing animals, then it doesn't really matter what distances you shoot, or where you place your shots. Find some fur and pull the trigger, the bullet will do the rest...
With regards to your latter statement. I used to hear the same argument from folks like you about the .17 caliber centerfires. Now it seems like everyone is shooting one at predators. Why? Because if you sell fur, it is the "best tool for the job". However, if you shoot one and don't take into consideration the "range", "good marksmanship" and "perfect shot placement", even the .17 centerfires will fail due to operator error.
Before you crap on a round you've probably never even shot, give the guys who are shooting it a chance to try it out, before dismissing us as people who are just "trying to justify a purchase" (which is an ignorant statement, IMO).
Eric