It happened to me
- Thread starter Harvey7
- Start date
Originally Posted By: kal52and I hope I never do
at the time the gun was taken the OP did not legally possess that firearm
it was still as far as we know still the tenants property
Prove it.
Because now what you're implying, is that the property owner was breaking the law. Which is not how he explained the situation at all. He stated the state he resides in allows him to take keep the items, and assume full ownership after X amount of days.
So show me how he wasn't legally possessing that firearm.
Travis
at the time the gun was taken the OP did not legally possess that firearm
it was still as far as we know still the tenants property
Prove it.
Because now what you're implying, is that the property owner was breaking the law. Which is not how he explained the situation at all. He stated the state he resides in allows him to take keep the items, and assume full ownership after X amount of days.
So show me how he wasn't legally possessing that firearm.
Travis
prove what?
I never once implied he was breaking the law, in fact I don't know what the private property laws in his state are
Like I said earlier, im no lawyer or Leo, and I don't know the laws of his state, im basing my arguments on what little info the OP gave.
Up until that date the gun still belongs to the tenant, what I am saying is that the LEO may have thought it best to bring the gun in, and keep it at the station until the owner forfeits it. At which time the OP can come and get it, yes the cruddy ffl deal sucks.
remember, there were drug/para at the residence along with the gun, which also belonged to the ex tennants
I never once implied he was breaking the law, in fact I don't know what the private property laws in his state are
Like I said earlier, im no lawyer or Leo, and I don't know the laws of his state, im basing my arguments on what little info the OP gave.
Up until that date the gun still belongs to the tenant, what I am saying is that the LEO may have thought it best to bring the gun in, and keep it at the station until the owner forfeits it. At which time the OP can come and get it, yes the cruddy ffl deal sucks.
remember, there were drug/para at the residence along with the gun, which also belonged to the ex tennants
Last edited:
Originally Posted By: kal52
at the time the gun was taken the OP did not legally possess that firearm
it was still as far as we know still the tenants property
Your words. Not mine.
And if you are going off the OP, the cop plainly stated he was entitled to the firearm.
Travis
at the time the gun was taken the OP did not legally possess that firearm
it was still as far as we know still the tenants property
Your words. Not mine.
And if you are going off the OP, the cop plainly stated he was entitled to the firearm.
Travis
Catskinner
New member
deflave 1 - kal52 0
If you ever find yourself arguing in favor of a law enforcement officer taking a legally possessed firearm from a law abiding, United States citizen, you're probably wrong.
Travis
This sums it up nicely. Now everyone play nice.
If you ever find yourself arguing in favor of a law enforcement officer taking a legally possessed firearm from a law abiding, United States citizen, you're probably wrong.
Travis
This sums it up nicely. Now everyone play nice.
Catskinner
New member
Packers own the Bears