Two Princeton, MIT Scientists Say EPA Climate Regulations Based on a ‘Hoax’
Two Princeton, MIT Scientists Say EPA Climate Regulations Based on a ‘Hoax’
- Thread starter hm1996
- Start date
1oldcoyote
New member
When I was in grade school(early 60's). Scientists spoke of the "Green House Effect". Which involved rising CO levels & manufacturing pollution processes. Polluting the World's Atmosphere. ie; "We are all going to die unless drastic measures are implemented". Same old BS from decades past. Are still spread as FACT.
spotstalkshoot
Well-known member
What climate change is, democrats laundering taxpayer money into election funds through "green energy companies that bankrupt", gov union job expansion and university "grants". Same as Ukraine and the Biden's are getting their private cut of the action.
Originally Posted By: spotstalkshootWhat climate change is, democrats laundering taxpayer money into election funds through "green energy companies that bankrupt", gov union job expansion and university "grants". Same as Ukraine and the Biden's are getting their private cut of the action.
NAILED IT! ^^^^
NAILED IT! ^^^^
Plant.One
Well-known member
Originally Posted By: SoftpointThere is an old saying in the scientific community. "Computer models are always wrong but sometimes useful."
If you've ever worked in the sciences you understand how many theories and projected outcomes are sold.
computer models are only as good as the data they're fed. even then at best its a solid educated guess without real world testing to verify it against - for example wind tunnel testing of computer aerodynamic models. however - theres no way to actively test climate models in the real world because we cant control nature the way we can in my example of a wind tunnel test for aerodynamics.
so you can easily get the outcome you want by cherry picking the dataset entered. or plugging in data sets until you get the outcome you want anyway.
its why we see the "spaghetti" model of hurricane track forecasting - that way by giving dozens and dozens of possible paths, they can say "ah ha! we got it with [xyx] path, see we told you how smart we are!"
If you've ever worked in the sciences you understand how many theories and projected outcomes are sold.
computer models are only as good as the data they're fed. even then at best its a solid educated guess without real world testing to verify it against - for example wind tunnel testing of computer aerodynamic models. however - theres no way to actively test climate models in the real world because we cant control nature the way we can in my example of a wind tunnel test for aerodynamics.
so you can easily get the outcome you want by cherry picking the dataset entered. or plugging in data sets until you get the outcome you want anyway.
its why we see the "spaghetti" model of hurricane track forecasting - that way by giving dozens and dozens of possible paths, they can say "ah ha! we got it with [xyx] path, see we told you how smart we are!"
Foxpro.223
Well-known member
It's all designed to take freedom away from everyone and to consolidate power and control into the hands of a few.