Jesse lackey
New member
I know I said I was staying out of this, but I don't think I can.
Hicker, every time someone tries to defend themselves, you say "if you would read what I posted, you would see that that's not what I said." Well, maybe you should look back. The original question was, if a dog running in an area would affect the way the coyotes respond to a call later. Not if it affects finding property to hunt, or anything else. Also, it was said that if someone could hunt a large piece, but there was one person with an acre attached, why should that keep them off the large piece, and you flipped it around to say. That he is turning dogs loose onto hundreds of acres of property that he was unwelcome on.
Have you ever called on a small piece of ground? If so, then you knowingly run the risk of injuring a coyote and having it cross a property line to lay and bleed out. So if and when this happens, do you leave it to lay and die, or do you "trespass" to go get it? In your way of thinking, neither one is "ethical."
If nothing else, Know This. This is not a fight than myself or any other houndsman is willing to quit. No matter weather you say that not all dog men are bad or not, there is simply no way to separate the good from the bad in the eyes of the law, and the antis. By taking the rights away from the bad ones, you take them from the good ones aswell. So of course we will stand and fight until the end when our ways are attacked. And I don't think that simple words posted on a board from hundreds of miles away are capable of judging a mans "character" by. It seems like some people are just hear to pick a fight with a slick tongue and a key pad, and I promise that people like me will always be here to greet you with an iron fist and a club.
Hicker, every time someone tries to defend themselves, you say "if you would read what I posted, you would see that that's not what I said." Well, maybe you should look back. The original question was, if a dog running in an area would affect the way the coyotes respond to a call later. Not if it affects finding property to hunt, or anything else. Also, it was said that if someone could hunt a large piece, but there was one person with an acre attached, why should that keep them off the large piece, and you flipped it around to say. That he is turning dogs loose onto hundreds of acres of property that he was unwelcome on.
Have you ever called on a small piece of ground? If so, then you knowingly run the risk of injuring a coyote and having it cross a property line to lay and bleed out. So if and when this happens, do you leave it to lay and die, or do you "trespass" to go get it? In your way of thinking, neither one is "ethical."
If nothing else, Know This. This is not a fight than myself or any other houndsman is willing to quit. No matter weather you say that not all dog men are bad or not, there is simply no way to separate the good from the bad in the eyes of the law, and the antis. By taking the rights away from the bad ones, you take them from the good ones aswell. So of course we will stand and fight until the end when our ways are attacked. And I don't think that simple words posted on a board from hundreds of miles away are capable of judging a mans "character" by. It seems like some people are just hear to pick a fight with a slick tongue and a key pad, and I promise that people like me will always be here to greet you with an iron fist and a club.