bolton

I don't believe Trump would have ever been worried about Biden in any shape or form. Fear of Biden in the next election? No chance.
Trump would have Biden so that he couldn't give his name correctly on a debate stage.
 
Originally Posted By: Coyotehunter_Originally Posted By: songdogin other words, you don't believe what the transcripts of the actual phone call say? And instead want to believe more hearsay?

More witch hunt news....

The actual transcript is locked away in a super-secret server that was reserved in the past for top-secret spies and such. There is a reason why Trump's comrades hide the actual tape of the phone call away from all eyes. Then they made a fake transcript that left out key parts of the phone call trying to hide the truth.

Bolton probably was in on the scheme and can tell the people what Trump actually did.

The transcript of the phone call had a disclaimer on that stated it was not a verbatim transcript, but was recreated from notes of those present at the time of the call.
 
Originally Posted By: hm1996Originally Posted By: GRIZZLYONEIt's over Friday.

And the Dims will re-start their "investigation" of some new wild az dream of theirs on Monday......maybe sooner.
cursing.gif


Regards,
hm

Saddle up, boys, same song 14th verse......and many more to come as soon as they can make 'em up:

Quote:Nadler says House Democrats will "likely" subpoena Bolton

House Judiciary Chairman Jerry Nadler (D-N.Y.) said Wednesday that it is "likely" House Democrats will subpoena former national security adviser John Bolton and continue investigations into President Trump's hold on military aid to Ukraine, according to CNN's Manu Raju.

The state of play: Trump is set to be acquitted on articles of impeachment centered on the Ukraine saga, and Republican senators voted last week against calling new witnesses, including Bolton, in the impeachment trial.


•Bolton alleges in the manuscript of forthcoming book that Trump explicitly tied the Ukraine aid to political investigations of his opponents, including former Vice President Joe Biden and his family, and asked in early May to ensure that Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky would meet with Rudy Giuliani.

What they're saying: Nadler said he was not worried about the potential political backlash from continuing the investigations, saying, "I think when you have a lawless president, you have to bring that to the fore and you have to spotlight that."
• "You have to protect the Constitution, whatever the political consequences," Nadler said. "As more and more lawlessness comes out, I presume the public will understand that."

[url=htts://www.axios.com/jerry-nadler-john-bolton-subpoena-ukraine-f2cd6ced-056f-4815-b230-df8b42b6b69c][url=htts://www.axios.com/jerry-nadler-john-bolton-subpoena-ukraine-f2cd6ced-056f-4815-b230-df8b42b6b69c]htts://www.axios.com/jerry-nadler-john-bolton-subpoena-ukraine-f2cd6ced-056f-4815-b230-df8b42b6b69c[/url][/url]

Regards,
hm
 
The part about "you have to protect the Constitution, whatever the political consequences" only applies when the Democrats want to use it as a talking point. When it comes to the 2nd amendment they will throw the constitution right out the window, then the constitution seems to mean nothing to them!
 
Back
Top