Remington 788?

bama_caine_break

New member
I saw one of these guns being used in a predator hunting video and got me thinkin about one. i think one cut down and painted up would make a nice little calling rifle/truck gun. Ive never shot or even handled one so i was lookin for some experience. How is accuracy and durability? thanks for the help

Matt
 
I have owned several over the years, in fact my first centerfire was a .243 that my dad gave me when I turned 12.....I still have it, and I am nowhere near 12 anymore! Frankly, I dont have a clue how many shots that old rifle has through it, but it has put its share of coyote noses in the dust. They are a bit crudely made by many standards, but often turn in mind blowing accuracy. In fact, I currently own one in .308, that has been tricked out by turning it into a single shot, custom bbl, custom stock, trigger and some other little touches that is the most accurate rifle I own. This will be heresy to some, but it actually shoots better than my 40X. Sounds like you have a fun project in mind!
 
The 788s are great guns. You can usually find one at a gun show or on one of the gun auction websites for a decent price.
They were made in many chamberings. I have one in 243 that will shoot tiny little groups at 100 yds. The triggers aren't the best but Timney makes one that will drop right in.
If you get one you won't be dissatisfied.
 
I here the 788 was too expensive for remington to continue
to produce, supossed to be great guns though. looked at one a year or so ago .243 carbine.(should have bought it)
was worried about finding replacement parts (clips and bolt
[beeep]'y most commonly replaced) if you do a search on P.M.
you will find lots of info to help you in deciding.
good luck
cdn1
 
I am rigging a .243 Carbine for a coyote/deer special. I'll get a pic up as soon as I can. I paid $165.00 out the door for it at a little gun show at the fair grounds here. Ordered a new stock from Numrich (www.e-gunparts.com), it is coming together. Got my sling and Harris bipod on and will be glass bedding the action soon. Gonna be putting on a Burris 3x9 or 4.5x14 "tacticool" scope on it just to hop it up a tad. Already MOA accurate so I can't wait to see what a free float and glass bed will do for it. Parts are out there.

Here it is so far:

IMG_3809.jpg
 
Had a 222 that I traded for a 220 swift years ago. I will never forgive myself. Great gun and gave the BDL too much competition so they had to dicontinue it.
 
Here is a little 788 history I have on file for you. Don't jump on me you 788 fans, this is stuff I've downloaded over the years. I don't own a 788, but worked on a few when I had my shop.

Firearm Model History
Model 788
Description:
Moderately priced, bolt action rifle commonly referred to as "Remington’s budget tackdriver".

Introduction Year: 1967
Year Discontinued: 1983

Total Production: Approximately 565,000

Designer/Inventor: Wayne Leek

Action Type: Bolt action

Caliber/Gauge:

.222 Rem. – 1967 – 1980, 1982
.223 Rem. – 1975
.22-250 Rem. – 1967
.243 Win. 1968; w/ 18 ½" barrel 1980
6mm. Rem. – 1969 – 1980
6mm. Rem. Left Hand – 1969 – 1980
7mm-08 Rem. – 1980 w/ 18 ½" barrel
.308 Win. – 1969
.308 Win. Left Hand – 1969 – 1980; w/ 18 ½" barrel 1980
.30-30 Win. – 1967 – 1970
.44 Rem. Mag. – 1967 – 1970

Serial Number Blocks:
1967 – 010001 to 068460
1968 – 6200000 to 6899999
1974 – A6000000 to A6199999
1978 – B6000000 to B6199999

Grades Offered:
There were no high grades offered in this model.

Variations:
In 1980 changes to the stock included a fluted comb, thicker pistol grip, and wider fore-end.

Notes on the Remington 788

Popularity

The 788 has a cult following due to its original low cost and accuracy potential. Some even claim that it was discontinued because it was more accurate than the Model 700. While Blue Books list them about $150 less than same-caliber plain Model 700's, gun shows and shops sometimes have them for equivalent prices! Other times, they are screaming bargains on the used racks.

IMHO the best one are the .222's, because of the lower case pressure and smaller case head makes for less bolt thrust. A .222Rem 788 (well cared for) can be shot for a lifetime. The .243Win and .308Win versions can be problematic if consistently loaded hot. The .223Rem's are okay but (IMHO) should not be used constantly with the hot 5.56mm NATO ammo. While a Remington 700 doesn't care, the hotter military loads in 5.56mm stress the action more.

I was once quite enamoured with 788's but have decided that they are utilitarian guns that have limited lifetimes. They are worth having the bolts fixed, barrel free-floated and glass bedded. They are not worth having expensive work done like: custom stocks, checkering, aftermarket barrels installed, and so on. (Unless... you are doing it yourself as a home project on a gun that you are not afraid to bugger-up. I'd rather butcher a 788 than a 700!)

While reading this, you might feel I am overly critical. After all, the rifle was very accurate, very reasonably priced and it does work. On the other hand, bolt action rifles are a mature technology, and in some cases are relied upon for the utmost in reliability in life and death situations. Given that, and several serious flaws, it is alarming that some enthusiasts seek to propel this model into the Classic category.

My take on the 788 now? If you want a receiver to shoot 3500 rounds through, rebarrel, do it again, repeat, get something else. If you are going across the country or world for the hunt of a lifetime, it is more likely to let you down than a more proven, classic action. If you want something for casual hunts and plinking with, it will do just fine.
The Good and the Bad

Here's my standard list of 788 comments:
Good stuff

1. Good or great accuracy

2. Economical (at least when new)

3. Very fast lock time

4. Short action

5. Rigid receiver

6. 60 degree bolt throw

7. Magazine unloads rifle quickly (still have to unload chamber)

8. 700-style round receiver profile makes bedding and restocking straightforward.

Bad stuff

1. Bolt compression leads to case stretch and eventually excessive headspace, especially on the .473" head, high pressure models (.308Win, 7mm-08Rem, .22-250Rem, .244Rem). Not a rifle for maxed-out handloads. Better suited to the small-head cartridges like the 45K CUP pressure .222Rem cartridge.

2. Brazed-on straight, hollowed (ugly) bolt handle tends to break off. Can be fixed by a real gunsmith with proper heat sinks, heat control paste and a MIG or TIG welder. Don't let an animal with an arc welder ruin your bolt.

3. High ejection angle interferes with scope knobs. The only fixes are a 90 degree rotated scope or very high scope rings.

4. Small ejection port makes it hard to clear when jammed. Combined with the ejection angle's tendency to bounce empty shells off the scope and back into the action, this can be a serous problem when an urgent second shot is required.

5. The magazine tends to rattle, a problem for hunters.

6. The trigger is not adjustable, but a pro can do a bit of a trigger job on it. It can be lightened and cleaned up, but only to a point. The only aftermarket trigger is Canjar, very nice but insanely expensive.

7. The receiver, while rigid, is overly heavy for a short action rifle. The result is a light-barreled, short action rifle that weighs as much (ore more) as most standard rifles.

8. Not much meat on the barrel, which makes it hard to set-back a turn to correct an excessive headspace condition. Setting back the barrel a quarter turn leaves the sights and marking unusable.

9. Spaces around the receiver lug hid bluing crystals, the guns were poorly rinsed at the factory, so many 788's have rust, or no bluing left.

10. Beech stock and stamped metal make for an over-all cheap appearance. It looks like a nice rifle from afar, but a close look reveals it's a cheapie. The stamped bottom metal is particularly plain. The plain white-wood stock is very light. There are no caps on the pistol grip or forend. There is no checkering of any kind available. Sling holders are not quick-detachable.

11. Magazines are getting scarcer and scarcer but still can be found, but can also be lost.

12. Single stack magazine limits capacity and spoils lines.

13. Unsupported bolt has a sloppy feel after unlocking, compared to the piston-like feel of Classics like the Model 70 and Model 700.

Bolt handle breakage

Unlike the Remington 700 bolt, which is high-temperature brazed along the bolt body and very sturdy, the bolt handle of the 788 is low-temperature brazed directly to the side of the bolt body. As a result it can be broken off with sufficient force in trying to extract a stuck case.

If you doubt the bolt-handle really breaks off... read this.
Case one, second try, third try
Another
Another
Another
Another
Bolt Compression

The Achilles heel of the Model 788 is the combination of the rear-locking bolt, brazed-on bolt handle, and high pressure cartridges with standard head sizes. When a fired cartridge gets wedged in the chamber, the bolt handle is leaned on until it breaks off. While this issue affects primarily reloaders, benchresters and other experimenters, a broken bolt in the field can ruin a hunt.

If you have a small head size (.222Rem, .223Rem) 788, or one of the rimmed 788's (.44Mag, .30-30) this issue is less likely to affect you. However, even these rifles are not good choices to explore max reloads with.

The late Gale McMillan set us rec.gunners straight when he explained how bolt compression and case length growth with high pressure loads doomed the 788 to a short stay at the benchrest line.

The rear locking bolt compresses, allows the case to stretch. This leads to short case life and possible case head separation (for reloaded cases). Stuart Otteson's The Bolt Action Rifle: A Design Analysis bears this out, calculating a .001" compression per thousand pounds of bolt thrust. Since a full-strength .308 Winchester cartridge has as much as 6,000 pounds of bolt thrust, handloaders can see the problem here.

Discontinued

I have heard three versions as to why the 788 was discontinued.

1. It was more accurate than a 700, and therefore an embarrassment to the company.

2. They lost a huge lawsuit concerning the saftey mechanism and discontinued it for liability reasons. (I recall an excellent rec.guns post on this about a decade ago, which I cannot find.)

3. It costs more than the 700 to make.

The last is supported by Otteson's book The Bolt Action Rifle, which explains how some misguided management design goals and complicated tooling made the 788 an expensive rifle to produce.

In addition I have my own theory:

1. They ran Mossberg out of the low-end centerfire rifle business (Mossberg 800) and Savage dropped their one-lug (Model 340) model, so they succeeded in dominating that segment of the market, dropped it and made more money selling more expensive Model 700's.

If I recall correctly, the last production of the 788 were all the carbine version, which had a very short barrel. The muzzle blast is very high, especially on the 243 version. (I'm not a big fan of short barreled .243's!)
Production History

This is the production history, as far as I can piece it together. I am working from multiple sources but I have no way of verifying any of this information.

1967 Production Begins. The Remington 788 competes against other economy bolt actions: Savage Model 340 (Short action .222, 30-30), Savage 110E bolt actions (Long action .30-06, .243Win), Mossberg 800 (Short action, 60 degree bolt .222, .22-250Rem, .243Win and .308Win) and Winchester Model 770 (.222Rem, .22-250Rem, .243Win, .308Win, .270Win, .30-06).

Some initial debate about the accuracy potential of a rear-locking action rifle fades as actual reports of accuracy come in.

1970 (or before) Left Hand models available in 6mmRem and .308Win.

1972 O.F. Mossberg discontinues the Model 800 rifle.

1975 Bolt-lock function of safety is discontinued. The new rifles can be unloaded with the safety engaged.

197? Production normalization reduces number of available receiver lengths.

1979 O.F. Mossberg & Sons discontinues the Model 810 rifle, getting out of the centerfire rifle business.

1980 Stock contour changes slightly, and is now inletted for bottom metal to be mounted flush.

1980 The 7mm-08 Remington chambering introduced.

1980 The 243Win, 7mm-08Rem and .308Win models now only available in 18.5 inch length. The .223Rem and .22-250Rem have 24" barrels. All other chamberings obsolete.

1983 Last year of production.

Parts

Complete bolts have long been out of stock. However, if the bolt body is retained, a new bolt handle can be MIG or TIG welded on by any competent gunsmith. (Don't let an eager beaver with an arc welder or torch ruin your irreplacable bolt; it will anneal the rear lugs). Wisner's has made an exciting promise to make a reproduction bolt, but availability is not yet known.

Wolff Blitzschnell springs in 22 lbs (factory is 20 lbs) can be bought from gunsprings.com. Stock 788's have a plenty-fast lock time, but it is nice to know that some kind of commercial replacement is out there.

Magazines show up in old gun shops and gun shows on a regular basis, and vary in price from $15 to $30. CDNN has good prices and selections. Remember the 222 and 223 mags are interchangable, as are the 243 with the 7mm-08 and the .308.

Besides magazines, extractors and their rivets can be had from Brownell's. Despite buying Remington's old parts stock, they have no Remington bolts available.

Magazines are interchangable in similar sizes. The .222Rem and .223Rem can be interchanged, likewise the 7mm-08Rem with the .308Win. The most difficult magazines to find are the .44Mag and the .30-30WCF.

Here's another source for magazines, including .22-250.

Wisner's has bolt stops.

Ramline made a synthetic stock for the 788. While out of production for a while, it is still stocked at many vendors. Semi-inletted wood stocks are available from the usual sources, like Richards MicroFit and Wenig.

Canjar has a limited stock of 788 benchrest triggers. Last I checked, the price is over $300. Timney has finally introduced its long-awaited 788 trigger.
Silent Recall?

I've heard word that Remington had a silent recall on the Remington 788. I've heard two reports that if you sent one in for repair, you got a coupon back for $99 against a Remington 700 and a thank-you. Since then I've heard of repairs being done. This might reflect the curious nature of our tort law. Manufacturers settle on liabilities with clauses that there is a time limitation on remediation. After that they have discharged their duties.

Nowadays Remington uses Factory Authorized Service Centers, so I don't think this is the case anymore.

If anyone can clarify this, I'd appreciate it.

In March 2002 I noticed that some 700's had a recall due to the bolt lock. The Remington 788 was mentioned on the web site, for the first time (as far as I know) ever.

I am reproducing the text on the 788 verbatim, as a public service. The link, if it is still there by the time you read this, is:
Recall

Remington Model 788 bolt-action rifles are not included in the safety modification program.

Model 788 rifles were manufactured from 1967 until 1983. Model 788 rifles made before 1975 were equipped with a bolt-lock mechanism. IMPORTANT SAFETY NOTICE: If you have a Model 788 rifle with a bolt-lock mechanism, the manual safety must be placed in the .F. or .Off or Fire. position to lift the bolt and begin the process of unloading the rifle. Be sure the rifle is pointing in a safe direction anytime you move the manual safety to the .F. or .Off or Fire. position. After you have lifted the bolt, slide the bolt rearward and then immediately put the manual safety back in the .S. or .On safe. position and then continue the unloading process.

Regardless of whether your Model 788 rifle has a bolt-lock mechanism you must always follow the 10 Commandments of Firearm Safety. Special care must be taken during the loading and unloading process. Always keep the muzzle pointed in a safe direction. Always unload your rifle when not actually in use. Every firearm should be unloaded as soon as you are finished shooting . before taking it into your car, camp or house. Remington wants you to enjoy the shooting sports - safely!

Should you desire service on any of your Remington firearms please feel free to call us on our toll free service line (800) 243.9700 or visit the Remington Authorized Repair Center nearest you.

©2002 Remington Arms Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
www.remington.com
 
Bob
Thanks for all the great info, glad you chose to share it with us. Like a lot of shooters/builders, several 788s have passed through here. My son still has one of the finest I have ever seen. My brother built it about 18 years ago. It's a custom single shot with a Shilen S/S barrel chambered for ......are you ready?.....a 17 Fireball.
Here are a few observations to add.
I have seen three different firing pin configurations over the years. They ranged from a crude stamped version to beautifully machined. I never figured that out in an action that was reported to have the finest and fastest lock time in the world /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/smile.gif
The trigger is attached ( captured? ) to a small tube or barrel which is welded to the receiver. Like the bolt handle, it can and will break. We have seen 2 "gun show specials" where the weld had broken, and the trigger still functioned. This is repairable. I could see this scaring the poo out of a corporate lawyer though!
You can still find reasonably priced 788s at gun shows, pawn shops, etc. They are still a good value.
David
 
Unfortunately, 788's have increased in price to the point where you'd probably be getting a better value with something like a Tikka. I wish that Savage made a detachable magazine model, as well.

I have a fair amount of experience with 788's so I'll share it:

788's are ugly and relatively heavy.

The detachable mag is the cat's meow for run and gun coyote hunting in parts of the world where you can't transport a loaded weapon. No jacking with floor plates with frozen fingers or cycling live rounds thru the chamber, etc...

They are typically decently accurate hunting rifles.

Don't reload like an idiot and you probably won't have any bolt handle problems. Anybody that loads to the point of a sticky bolt lift needs their head examined anyway. Also, anybody that only resizes to the point where they have to pound a bolt closed isn't much of or a very wise hunter, either.

The carbine length (18.5" bbl) does make a handy rifle for the truck and the brush.

I would use them as-built, meaning that I wouldn't invest in stocks or barrels and such. The 700 makes much more sense for that sort of thing.

I use 788's almost exclusively for coyote hunting (223, 22-250, amd 243. I even drug the 243 and 308 around deer hunting this year; even though I'm normally a 270 fan for deer, and had success with both.

All of that said, the prices have inflated beyond reason in the last 10 years. Part of that based on their utility, some of it on deserved reputatioin, and part of it on myth and folk lore.

They are just reasonable hunting rifles, nothing more. If you want something to hotrod, get something else.

788 action from this fall and one pic for size comparison between rifle and carbine length:

Carbine Length:

308_Buck.JPG


Rifle Length:

30661Tattered_ears.jpg


2 carb's and a rifle:

306613_788.jpg
 
Back
Top