Record number of wolves killed this year
By MIKE STARK - The Billings Gazette - 12/05/06
Wolves caught eating what they shouldn’t are paying a higher price these days.
A record number has been killed this year in the northern Rocky Mountains for going after cows, sheep, dogs and other domestic animals.
So far, 152 wolves have been shot by government agents or private landowners, about 50 more than last year and an eight-fold increase from five years ago.
In Wyoming, one-quarter of all wolves living outside Yellowstone’s protective boundary were killed after reports of attacks on livestock.
Wolf managers are taking a more aggressive tack with problem wolves mostly because the population in Montana, Wyoming and Idaho has soared beyond expectation in recent years.
“We’ve got a recovered population so we’re pretty hard on them if they get into trouble,” said Ed Bangs, wolf recovery coordinator for the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
There are at least 1,264 wolves in the three states, according to new figures provided Monday.
That’s roughly a 20 percent increase over 2005, which is on top of years of steady growth since wolves were reintroduced to Yellowstone National Park and central Idaho in 1995 and 1996.
“I’m surprised we ever got over 1,000 wolves but in the long term I think it will be less,” Bangs said. “I think we’re on the top edge of that bubble and it’s going to go down.”
All three states saw the number of wolves grow in 2006 over the previous year. Montana’s total increased from 256 to 300, Wyoming’s grew from 252 to about 314 and Idaho’s grew from 512 to around 650.
In Montana, the increased numbers reflect more wolves in the northwest part of the state and better reporting on the ground in recent years, said Carolyn Sime, who leads the wolf program for Montana Fish, Wildlife and Parks.
“I feel like the minimum estimates are more realistic now than anything in the last 10 years,” she said.
Much of the best wolf habitat, especially in Yellowstone, is filling up. Eventually, as the good spots disappear and it becomes harder to find ample food, the population will dip back down, Bangs said.
So far this year, wolves in the three states have killed 170 cows, 344 sheep, eight dogs, a horse, a mule and two llamas, according to the Fish and Wildlife Service. The kills — greater for sheep and cattle than any other year — are almost certainly higher than the numbers show because confirming wolf kills can be difficult.
But more wolves have been killed in turn.
The vast majority were shot by agents with federal Wildlife Services. A small percentage were killed by private landowners in Montana and Idaho, which were recently given more flexibility in pursuing wolves that were trying to kill livestock.
Typically, 6 to 7 percent of the wolf population has been culled by “lethal control,” as some call it. This year, the rate is around 12 percent overall and 25 percent in Wyoming outside Yellowstone.
“It’s still just a small percentage of wolves involved but when a pack gets into chronic trouble, we get rid of ’em,” Bangs said.
A University of Calgary study published earlier this year said killing problem wolves is only a temporary solution to livestock attacks. Once the offender is removed, another eventually moves in to take its place.
“Wolves are being killed as a corrective, punitive measure — not a preventative one,” Marco Musiani, one of the study’s authors, said earlier this year.
A better approach, he said, is to look at when and where depredations occur and take steps like changing grazing patterns, and using guard dogs, fencing, wolf repellants and other measures.
Though wolves grab the attention, their impact on domestic animals is far exceeded by other predators.
Coyotes kill 28 times more sheep and lambs than wolves, according to figures compiled by the U.S. Department of Agriculture. Foxes, dogs, bears and even eagles also rank higher, and that’s not to mention weather, diseases and lambing complications.
For losses that are confirmed kills by wolves and grizzly bears, the conservation group Defenders of Wildlife pays the value of the animals lost.
“I think we’re looking at a little above average year,” said Suzanne Stone, who works out of the group’s Idaho office.
The group has paid out $153,930 for wolf kills so far this year, more than $50,000 over 2005.
Mixed clues about mystery predator
BILLINGS (LEE) — Was it a wolf or wasn’t it?
The mysterious, sheep-killing predator shot and killed a month ago between Jordan and Circle was initially thought to be a wolf.
But now, wildlife officials aren’t so sure.
“Frankly, it has mixed characteristics,” said Carolyn Sime, head of the wolf program for Montana Fish, Wildlife and Parks.
Some clues indicate that it’s not a wolf from among the 1,200 or so that live in Montana, Wyoming and Idaho. The animal shot in Garfield County in early November had shades of orange, red and yellow in its fur, unlike the Northern Rockies wolves, which tend more toward browns, blacks and grays.
The orangish coat may be more indicative of wolves that roam the upper Great Lakes region, Sime said.
The animal also had long claws and teeth in good condition, somewhat unusual for a 4-year-old wolf, raising the possibility it might be a hybrid that had spent some time in captivity, Sime said.
On the other hand, the wolf was fairly large at 106 pounds with a big head and hunting skills, which may suggest it was wild, Sime said.
“Right now,” Sime said, “we’re just as curious as everyone else.”
Whatever it was, it had landowners in McCone, Garfield and Dawson counties on alert for months. About 120 sheep were killed and others were hurt in a series of attacks that started about a year ago.
The animal roamed wide swaths of the landscape, occasionally attacking sheep before moving on only to circle back later. Several landowners were given permits to shoot if it was seen attacking livestock but it was never caught in the act.
The animal eluded trackers for months until this fall, when footprints were spotted in deep snow. Agents with Wildlife Services shot it from the air Nov. 2.
The animal was initially reported as a wolf, but closer inspection raised concerns about the identification.
Muscle tissue has been sent to the University of California Los Angeles, where scientists have been analyzing DNA from the Northern Rockies wolf population and putting together a sort of family tree.
The animal’s carcass was sent to the National Fish and Wildlife Forensics Laboratory in Ashland, Ore., for genetic analysis.
The work could take several months to complete.
Sime said that if the animal is a wolf that came in from the Rockies or Canada or the upper Midwest, the genetic testing should provide clear evidence. It wouldn’t be the first time that a wolf has wandered hundreds of miles. In recent years, wolves from Yellowstone have been found in Utah and Colorado.
“If it’s neither of those, the question becomes ‘OK, what is this animal and where is it from?”’ Sime said. “The uncertainty level goes up a lot.”
By MIKE STARK - The Billings Gazette - 12/05/06
Wolves caught eating what they shouldn’t are paying a higher price these days.
A record number has been killed this year in the northern Rocky Mountains for going after cows, sheep, dogs and other domestic animals.
So far, 152 wolves have been shot by government agents or private landowners, about 50 more than last year and an eight-fold increase from five years ago.
In Wyoming, one-quarter of all wolves living outside Yellowstone’s protective boundary were killed after reports of attacks on livestock.
Wolf managers are taking a more aggressive tack with problem wolves mostly because the population in Montana, Wyoming and Idaho has soared beyond expectation in recent years.
“We’ve got a recovered population so we’re pretty hard on them if they get into trouble,” said Ed Bangs, wolf recovery coordinator for the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
There are at least 1,264 wolves in the three states, according to new figures provided Monday.
That’s roughly a 20 percent increase over 2005, which is on top of years of steady growth since wolves were reintroduced to Yellowstone National Park and central Idaho in 1995 and 1996.
“I’m surprised we ever got over 1,000 wolves but in the long term I think it will be less,” Bangs said. “I think we’re on the top edge of that bubble and it’s going to go down.”
All three states saw the number of wolves grow in 2006 over the previous year. Montana’s total increased from 256 to 300, Wyoming’s grew from 252 to about 314 and Idaho’s grew from 512 to around 650.
In Montana, the increased numbers reflect more wolves in the northwest part of the state and better reporting on the ground in recent years, said Carolyn Sime, who leads the wolf program for Montana Fish, Wildlife and Parks.
“I feel like the minimum estimates are more realistic now than anything in the last 10 years,” she said.
Much of the best wolf habitat, especially in Yellowstone, is filling up. Eventually, as the good spots disappear and it becomes harder to find ample food, the population will dip back down, Bangs said.
So far this year, wolves in the three states have killed 170 cows, 344 sheep, eight dogs, a horse, a mule and two llamas, according to the Fish and Wildlife Service. The kills — greater for sheep and cattle than any other year — are almost certainly higher than the numbers show because confirming wolf kills can be difficult.
But more wolves have been killed in turn.
The vast majority were shot by agents with federal Wildlife Services. A small percentage were killed by private landowners in Montana and Idaho, which were recently given more flexibility in pursuing wolves that were trying to kill livestock.
Typically, 6 to 7 percent of the wolf population has been culled by “lethal control,” as some call it. This year, the rate is around 12 percent overall and 25 percent in Wyoming outside Yellowstone.
“It’s still just a small percentage of wolves involved but when a pack gets into chronic trouble, we get rid of ’em,” Bangs said.
A University of Calgary study published earlier this year said killing problem wolves is only a temporary solution to livestock attacks. Once the offender is removed, another eventually moves in to take its place.
“Wolves are being killed as a corrective, punitive measure — not a preventative one,” Marco Musiani, one of the study’s authors, said earlier this year.
A better approach, he said, is to look at when and where depredations occur and take steps like changing grazing patterns, and using guard dogs, fencing, wolf repellants and other measures.
Though wolves grab the attention, their impact on domestic animals is far exceeded by other predators.
Coyotes kill 28 times more sheep and lambs than wolves, according to figures compiled by the U.S. Department of Agriculture. Foxes, dogs, bears and even eagles also rank higher, and that’s not to mention weather, diseases and lambing complications.
For losses that are confirmed kills by wolves and grizzly bears, the conservation group Defenders of Wildlife pays the value of the animals lost.
“I think we’re looking at a little above average year,” said Suzanne Stone, who works out of the group’s Idaho office.
The group has paid out $153,930 for wolf kills so far this year, more than $50,000 over 2005.
Mixed clues about mystery predator
BILLINGS (LEE) — Was it a wolf or wasn’t it?
The mysterious, sheep-killing predator shot and killed a month ago between Jordan and Circle was initially thought to be a wolf.
But now, wildlife officials aren’t so sure.
“Frankly, it has mixed characteristics,” said Carolyn Sime, head of the wolf program for Montana Fish, Wildlife and Parks.
Some clues indicate that it’s not a wolf from among the 1,200 or so that live in Montana, Wyoming and Idaho. The animal shot in Garfield County in early November had shades of orange, red and yellow in its fur, unlike the Northern Rockies wolves, which tend more toward browns, blacks and grays.
The orangish coat may be more indicative of wolves that roam the upper Great Lakes region, Sime said.
The animal also had long claws and teeth in good condition, somewhat unusual for a 4-year-old wolf, raising the possibility it might be a hybrid that had spent some time in captivity, Sime said.
On the other hand, the wolf was fairly large at 106 pounds with a big head and hunting skills, which may suggest it was wild, Sime said.
“Right now,” Sime said, “we’re just as curious as everyone else.”
Whatever it was, it had landowners in McCone, Garfield and Dawson counties on alert for months. About 120 sheep were killed and others were hurt in a series of attacks that started about a year ago.
The animal roamed wide swaths of the landscape, occasionally attacking sheep before moving on only to circle back later. Several landowners were given permits to shoot if it was seen attacking livestock but it was never caught in the act.
The animal eluded trackers for months until this fall, when footprints were spotted in deep snow. Agents with Wildlife Services shot it from the air Nov. 2.
The animal was initially reported as a wolf, but closer inspection raised concerns about the identification.
Muscle tissue has been sent to the University of California Los Angeles, where scientists have been analyzing DNA from the Northern Rockies wolf population and putting together a sort of family tree.
The animal’s carcass was sent to the National Fish and Wildlife Forensics Laboratory in Ashland, Ore., for genetic analysis.
The work could take several months to complete.
Sime said that if the animal is a wolf that came in from the Rockies or Canada or the upper Midwest, the genetic testing should provide clear evidence. It wouldn’t be the first time that a wolf has wandered hundreds of miles. In recent years, wolves from Yellowstone have been found in Utah and Colorado.
“If it’s neither of those, the question becomes ‘OK, what is this animal and where is it from?”’ Sime said. “The uncertainty level goes up a lot.”
