“Loss Of Trust”

Beluebow

New member
Last week, the man in charge of America’s Intercontinental Ballistic Missile (ICBM) defense system was fired by Barack Obama. Of course, you have heard almost nothing about this from Obama’s kept media. They have no curiosity about why General Michael [beeep], a 35 year Air Force officer and a man with a sterling record of service to our nation, would be fired with no reasons offered by this anti-military Administration.

In the middle of his golf tour and a few threatening statements to Ted Cruz, Barack Obama found time to flop General [beeep] from his position as commander of our most essential missile defense system.

In the absence of media scrutiny, speculation is filling in the blanks. The website militarycorruption.com is covering this story; and as usual, it is doing an outstanding job. Thinking out loud, MC.com wonders what the General could have done wrong (or, more to the point, what he has done right.) They are asking why no one is demanding to hear the rationale behind this move and pressing to discover what really happened. MC.com is asking if it could be because General [beeep] has expressed an unwillingness to participate in a future Obama order to institute martial law.

Remember Obama’s whispered assurances to the Russians that once he was re-elected, he would be able to strip America of its missile defenses? Is this firing a payback to the Russians for some concession they have made?

For a town that thrives on rumors and gossip, Washington is eerily quiet about the [beeep] firing. Mc.com puts it this way: “All we’ve been told so far is what [beeep] didn’t do wrong. Pentagon flaks assure us that the humiliating relief of command was not the result of gambling drug use, sexual impropriety, or criminal conduct. They say it isn’t related to operational deficiencies or recent inspection results. They haven’t mentioned homosexuality – that old stand-by charge used to destroy a targeted officer, if all else failed….. No, the Pentagon will only say that the drastic action was triggered by a ‘loss of trust.’ What the [beeep] does that mean? That [beeep] refused to ‘follow orders’ from the ‘commander-in-chief’ because he loves America more?”

Yes, just what the [beeep] does “Loss of trust” mean?

Read more at http://www.westernjournalism.com/loss-trust-mean-obamas-firing-top-general/#DdkiqQRTIl2URAQ0.99
 
Probably means the same thing that it does to the majority of Americans; 'loss of trust' in the administration to do things that benefit Americans, and not the administration. The only one that knows(and we can't get access to) is the air force officer.
 
O's just getting his ducks into position. Look at how many top Generals and Admirals he has dumped. He's buying loyalty by promoting his own . This is a serious game he's playing. We are so screwed.
 
Last edited:
Agreed, he appears to be playing a long game. Whatever advantage he gains & maintains now could be called on to add to the next Proggie/Socialist POC elected. Its' a battle for hearts & minds and it is playing out at home this time.

revolution may be the answer to purge socialism/liberalism for the next 200yrs.

T2G
 
I've been trying to find any documentation to a rumor that I heard prior to the military shake up, but have not found anything halfway reliable...Maybe some of you with your ears more to the ground than I have will hear something...

Supposedly there were orders to dump a nuclear warhead fairly close to the Norfolk, VA bay and a certain high ranking general countermanded the order and had it dumped farther out in the Atlantic where it would not be a potential problem....

According to the rumor, there was a potential for it detonating and potentially being blamed on a terrorist act that would have precipitated a declaration of Martial Law...

If any of the rumor is factual, it would explain the Loss of Trust application as applied and I doubt that something of that nature would have rested solely on one commanding officer's order without subsequent follow up down the line...
 
Back
Top