Predator Masters using UBB.threads ™ Infopop Corporation.
PM Gear Moon & Weather

Welcome to the Predator Masters Forums
Be sure to visit the main Predator Master website at





PM Gear
PM Gear
PM Gear
The Official Predator Masters Search Engine
Search Predator Masters

Page 5 of 6 < 1 2 3 4 5 6 >
Topic Options
#2727213 - 10/05/14 04:17 PM Re: Warden search authority? [Re: 6724]
woodguru Offline
Die Hard Member III

Registered: 10/30/12
Posts: 3361
Loc: California
Originally Posted By: 6724
Originally Posted By: bigsky_songdogs
Originally Posted By: Radio
Originally Posted By: fw707
Originally Posted By: Raspack
My question is, does he have the authority to open a closed vehicle and start pulling weapons out, that were NOT visible from the outside, and inspecting them?


In my opinion, the answer is yes.
And here is the reason he did:

Originally Posted By: Raspack
As the warden drove up and got out of his vehicle he said he would like to check licenses, any game we had taken and wanted to check guns. We both showed the requested paperwork and pulled the few dove from the ice chest. He then proceeded to open the back door of the truck and start pulling guns from the vehicle.


Your paperwork and doves were evidence you and your friend were hunting, so he had a legal right to check the guns used to take the doves.

In my opinion, he should have shown a little common courtesy and requested your consent first.


Agree with the above. Also the weapons were in plain sight if looking in the vehicle from outside, so it was not an illegal search by any stretch of the imagination. Pretty rude of him, but he was within his powers. You sure he wasn't one of the "Full of myself" agents on the TV show? whistle


This is a state by state issue. That crap might fly in the communist republic of CA but not in MT. Checking licenses , animals, etc is fine but here atleast a Warden has no authority to check a vehicle without permission, a search warrant, or exigent circumstances that would have to be articulated well to constitute a lawful search.


i would have to agree, in colorado your vehicle is considered an extension of your home. just because i have a fresh elk head in front of the house or in the garage, does not mean that the warden can walk freely into my house to check guns. like i said before, i am no attorney, BUT, i think any information/ evidence found in the truck without a warrant or consent would be thrown out by any objective judge.

but, i have seen personally law enforcement violate rights, mine. i was checking a rifle in at the airport once and there were some county cops hanging out, they came over to "inspect" my case, they wrote down the serial numbers off my rifles. pretty sure they have NO business in checking serial numbers without probable cause or consent. this was back many years before 9-11.

most of the law enforcement people that i have dealt with, both good and bad, know very little about the law and hope their "victim" does not either. when called on their behavior many have backed down.


If an elk or head is in sight at someone's home, yes the warden does have a right to ask for tags proving it was legally taken. If it was he would have no reason or desire to check guns. A vehicle has laws pertaining to driving around with loaded weapons, and establishing you are hunters with guns visible from outside the vehicle would give cause and the right to check to make sure those guns were unloaded.

As far as a citation for improper magazine plug? He didn't write it because he didn't have any way to prove you had or were using that shotgun in the field, a judge would have thrown it. He was just trying to give you a heads up for what could happen if you were checked while out shooting.

If a warden doesn't see a fisherman without a license actually using a pole in the water he can't write a citation for fishing without a license even if there is a pole sitting there not being used.
_________________________
A continual circulation of lies among those who are not much in the way of hearing them contradicted, will in time pass for their truth; the crime lies not in the believer but the inventor.
Thomas Paine

Ignorance is not okay

Top
#2865229 - 09/27/15 10:43 AM Re: Warden search authority? [Re: woodguru]
Airedale56 Offline
Die Hard Member

Registered: 07/09/08
Posts: 569
Loc: Wapiti, WY
[/quote]
A vehicle has laws pertaining to driving around with loaded weapons,...
[/quote]

The sentence might have better been started "In California"

Wyoming has no statutes regarding transport of firearms in vehicles.
Loaded is legal. Even chamber loaded. One can't assume someone is hunting, just because there is a gun in the car. Not everyone who shoots, hunts, i.e., one of my daughters. But she does pack.

In our State, generally, if there is a Bucking Horse on the license plate, there is probably a gun in the car. Guns are an integral part of Wyoming culture, especially the rural parts.
_________________________
It ain't lion hunting unless you get stitches - John in WYO

Top
#2983860 - 08/09/16 05:29 PM Re: Warden search authority? [Re: Fursniper]
Outlander Offline
New Member

Registered: 08/08/16
Posts: 12
Loc: Montana
Originally Posted By: Fursniper
The officers had justification to inspect the firearms to make sure the birds they were shown were taken by lawful methods. In this case, the firearms in the vehicle could be searched for without a warrant. A motor vehicle is also mobile which creates an exigent circumstance to search without a warrant.

I believe the search was lawful, but the officers did a poor job in how they handled their hunter contact in the field.

In AZ for example, there is actually a state statute that enables wildlife officers to search without a warrant. This statute only applies to wildlife officers, not for all AZ state peace officers.

ARS 17-211(E3) states in part,
E. Game rangers and wildlife managers may, in addition to other duties:

1. Execute all warrants issued for a violation of this title.

2. Execute subpoenas issued in any matter arising under this title.

3. Search without warrant any aircraft, boat, vehicle, box, game bag or other package where there is sufficient cause to believe that wildlife or parts of wildlife are possessed in violation of law.

4. Inspect all wildlife taken or transported and seize all wildlife taken or possessed in violation of law, or showing evidence of illegal taking.

5. Seize as evidence devices used illegally in taking wildlife and hold them subject to the provisions of section 17-240.

6. Generally exercise the powers of peace officers with primary duties the enforcement of this title.

7. Seize devices that cannot be lawfully used for the taking of wildlife and are being so used and hold and dispose of them pursuant to section 17-240.



That looks like another illegal law.

Top
#2984969 - 08/13/16 11:54 AM Re: Warden search authority? [Re: Raspack]
Fursniper Offline
Retired PM Staff

Registered: 09/14/09
Posts: 1967
Loc: AZ
Outlander..... Game Wardens need to be able to inspect wildlife that hunters/fishermen have in their possession in the field for compliance. That's their job. If you have nothing to hide, you should have no worries. No need to be so paranoid that you are feeling like a criminal (according to your other post).
_________________________
Introducing a new person to hunting and watching them be successful is more rewarding than being successful yourself.

Make time to create a conservationist.

Top
#2988710 - 08/27/16 01:16 AM Re: Warden search authority? [Re: Fursniper]
Outlander Offline
New Member

Registered: 08/08/16
Posts: 12
Loc: Montana
Originally Posted By: Fursniper
Outlander..... Game Wardens need to be able to inspect wildlife that hunters/fishermen have in their possession in the field for compliance. That's their job. If you have nothing to hide, you should have no worries. No need to be so paranoid that you are feeling like a criminal (according to your other post).


I am not agreeing or disagreeing with the law. Just pointing out the government is contradicting its own law, the constitution. According to their rules, they need to make amendments to allow for these field compliances. No, I have nothing to hide but don't like being accused of crimes I never committed either.



Edited by Outlander (08/27/16 01:19 AM)

Top
#2991283 - 09/05/16 04:48 PM Re: Warden search authority? [Re: Raspack]
W. Chad Shultz Offline
Die Hard Member

Registered: 03/18/10
Posts: 864
Loc: Winifred Montana
It would just be wonderful if wardens were taught to be courteous to hunters at least till a law is broken. I have worked close with some wardens in the past and they were good guys. I also have ran into several that treat everyone as criminals right off the bat and they just do it for kicks in my book. That is not acceptable behavior and should be eliminated.
_________________________
Livin the dream

Top
#2995548 - 09/25/16 10:38 AM Re: Warden search authority? [Re: Raspack]
ackleyman Offline
PM senior

Registered: 01/08/03
Posts: 8882
Loc: Hickville
at least they did not detain you for 2 hours running the serial numbers of all the guns in the truck, which we have had done. He ran all 4 guys in the truck for wants and warrants. This happened to me several times when I lived in Ca. going down the interstate, we were dressed in Cammo coming back from hunting. The Warden turned around and stopped us. We were nice, gave the warden permission to search, all was in order. He found out that we had been predator hunting, had 32 or more tails in our possession, and 2 hours later we were on our way. We showed our Mexican Hunting permits and Mexican gun Permits. We never had a cross word, and he kept asking leading questions trying to trap us into some kind of admission of a crime committed. We were all real nice people, and shocked was/is an understatement. This was 20 years ago. We were treated like sewer rats, just because we predator hunted.


Edited by ackleyman (09/25/16 04:11 PM)

Top
#2995587 - 09/25/16 12:54 PM Re: Warden search authority? [Re: Fursniper]
Coyotejunki Offline
PM senior

Registered: 04/03/04
Posts: 5196
Loc: MO
Quote:
If you have nothing to hide, you should have no worries.


I really hate that term when a search topic is brought up. I interpret it as You should be willing to forgo or give up all your rights if you didn't do anything illegal.
_________________________
futuaris nisi irrisus ridebis



Top
#2995644 - 09/25/16 06:26 PM Re: Warden search authority? [Re: Coyotejunki]
Tex Adams Offline
Predator Master

Registered: 11/02/15
Posts: 65
Loc: Wyoming
Yup, it's usually said by people who have little understanding of the Bill of Rights and the premise behind true freedom.



Tex
_________________________
=2

Top
#3001617 - 10/22/16 12:33 PM Re: Warden search authority? [Re: Outlander]
littledawg Offline
Seasoned Member

Registered: 01/01/10
Posts: 434
Loc: western
Originally Posted By: Outlander
Originally Posted By: Fursniper
Outlander..... Game Wardens need to be able to inspect wildlife that hunters/fishermen have in their possession in the field for compliance. That's their job. If you have nothing to hide, you should have no worries. No need to be so paranoid that you are feeling like a criminal (according to your other post).


I am not agreeing or disagreeing with the law. Just pointing out the government is contradicting its own law, the constitution. According to their rules, they need to make amendments to allow for these field compliances. No, I have nothing to hide but don't like being accused of crimes I never committed either.



It is not a contradiction. Probably outdated language, but it says "sufficient" cause which means probable cause. The same standard as any other Leo. It doesn't matter what the Leo's assignment is or where it is. Unlike Hillary they ALL have to operate under the same constitutional amendments.

Top
#3001646 - 10/22/16 03:33 PM Re: Warden search authority? [Re: littledawg]
Coyotejunki Offline
PM senior

Registered: 04/03/04
Posts: 5196
Loc: MO
Originally Posted By: littledawg
Originally Posted By: Outlander
Originally Posted By: Fursniper
Outlander..... Game Wardens need to be able to inspect wildlife that hunters/fishermen have in their possession in the field for compliance. That's their job. If you have nothing to hide, you should have no worries. No need to be so paranoid that you are feeling like a criminal (according to your other post).


I am not agreeing or disagreeing with the law. Just pointing out the government is contradicting its own law, the constitution. According to their rules, they need to make amendments to allow for these field compliances. No, I have nothing to hide but don't like being accused of crimes I never committed either.



It is not a contradiction. Probably outdated language, but it says "sufficient" cause which means probable cause. The same standard as any other Leo. It doesn't matter what the Leo's assignment is or where it is. Unlike Hillary they ALL have to operate under the same constitutional amendments.


4th amendment
Quote:
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.


OK, I am not a lawyer, but I see this as needing an issued warrant for reasonable searches. So now I am even more confused. How is a "Terry stop" and search really constitutional? I suppose the courts say it is, but lots of people think they got lots of rulings wrong. Obamacare for instance.


Edited by Coyotejunki (10/22/16 03:38 PM)
_________________________
futuaris nisi irrisus ridebis



Top
#3001668 - 10/22/16 05:46 PM Re: Warden search authority? [Re: littledawg]
fw707 Offline
Retired Moderator

Registered: 03/18/09
Posts: 9466
Loc: Roadside watermelon stand
Originally Posted By: littledawg

It is not a contradiction. Probably outdated language, but it says "sufficient" cause which means probable cause. The same standard as any other Leo. It doesn't matter what the Leo's assignment is or where it is. Unlike Hillary they ALL have to operate under the same constitutional amendments.


That is 100% correct.
thumbup1
_________________________
“better the hard truth, I say, than the comforting fantasy.”

Carl Sagan

Top
#3007114 - 11/10/16 09:43 AM Re: Warden search authority? [Re: Raspack]
zerowolf Offline
Predator Master

Registered: 02/10/16
Posts: 72
Loc: Michigan
I believe game wardens are given more authority than police because it would be nearly impossible to enforce game laws if they didn't.

There are limits but they are going to be slightly different depending on the state. If you live in a state where loaded weapons in a vehicle are legal then they have no reason to check them. If a game warden tells you that you did something illegal and doesn't cite you for it I would take that as a warning to go fix the issue.

Top
#3007638 - 11/12/16 06:46 AM Re: Warden search authority? [Re: Raspack]
Smokin250 Offline
Die Hard Member III

Registered: 06/18/08
Posts: 2676
Loc: South West, OH
I have a question I have always been curious on, which touches on this.

Several years ago a buddy of mine in Indiana had a picture of a game warden on his trail camera on their families property. He was unaware of why the GW was there, and was never approached by them. Years before that, here in ohio, several GW showed up a buddies farm. The "barn" where they stay is a ways off the road, and not readily accessible with out 4 wheel drive or a key to the gate. Several GW walked up the hill off main road. Come to find out some one had heard shooting and told the GW the land owner was poaching deer if I remember correctly. All because they did a lot of shooting. There was no illegal hunting going on or parts to illegally taken game.

Now, while I could understand the second situation, I am a little unclear on the first situation. Do GW have the right on to property with nothing more than a "tip", no warrant? Both of these situations were second hand information, and years ago. I am sure there were more details to it than that. However I am just curious what is "allowed"?

I personally have never had an issue with a GW. We used to get check every opening day of dove season, as we were hunting public land. Same thing every time, license, bag limit, and check gun for plug. As a rule of thumb, I like to stay legal in my hunting so I don't worry much about it. While I KNOW there can always be a bad apple in the bunch, as with any profession, I have had decent experiences so far.

Top
#3007652 - 11/12/16 08:47 AM Re: Warden search authority? [Re: Smokin250]
fw707 Offline
Retired Moderator

Registered: 03/18/09
Posts: 9466
Loc: Roadside watermelon stand
Brian, this is just one sentence I copy/pasted that pertains to your question. You can read the entire section for the details.

"OHIO REVISED CODE 1531.13

Any regularly employed salaried wildlife officer may enter any private lands or waters if the wildlife officer has good cause to believe and does believe that a law is being violated."


You can read the entire section regarding officer authority here:


http://codes.ohio.gov/orc/1531.13






Edited by fw707 (11/12/16 08:48 AM)
_________________________
“better the hard truth, I say, than the comforting fantasy.”

Carl Sagan

Top
Page 5 of 6 < 1 2 3 4 5 6 >




© Predator Masters™, All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.