Originally Posted By: masshunterThis is always a slippery slope. To each his own I think, no need to fall into the divide and conquer trap. Not to question the poster, but the anti groups love to read this. Like the bird hunters that voted to ban bear & bobcat hunting with hounds, the compound/ long bow, inline/ traditional BP hunters debates, nothing good can come of this. My dentist likes to hunt exotics on a "preserve", there are hunting mags in the office, he's proud to a hunter & NRA member, and stimulates the economy buying guns I can't afford. Some would question the fence issue, some would question if his AR is a "sporting rifle" I don't want to go there as well. If its legal its OK in my book.
+1 - I unfortunately believe that many times, brother hunters can be our own worst enemy. I have met many a decent man and hunter that doesn't believe any of us has the right to take a semi-auto anything into the woods to hunt anything. I think we all know the difference between ethical and unethical hunting. You can be just as unethical with a single shot or a bolt-action as one can be with his semi-auto 12 gauge or AR.
Gun owners and hunters don't need to divide ranks on hunting equipment or harvesting methods unless they want someone to call their's out as well.