http://www.predatormastersforums.com/for...541#Post3274541

.... over a year ago ... we had touched on this topic and Kirsch with "strike-one", "strike-two", "strike three" had written the right reasons ... for which the thermal clip-on it is not loved by American night hunters. In the USA they sell 1 clip-on versus 200 pure thermal riflescopes. Instead in Europe and here in Italy in particular .... the relationship is reversed ... Do you think that, if I myself wanted to buy the brand new Infiray CH50W thermal clip-on, I would have to book it ....As soon as it arrives at the dealer it is already sold !! Do you think that I have not yet been able to try it (!!!) Anyway I remain of the opinion of Kirsch and Skinney .... the pure thermal riflescope is much more comfortable and less invasive. Here in Italy there is a lot of night selection hunting for tower stand hogs. Perhaps this is the reason why the clip-on is much preferred .... It also seems that Zeroing is easier, because the calibration of the telescope is preserved .... After more than a year what about do you think guys? Do you still keep your opinion? Thank you all for the answers....

https://youtu.be/JrfNtT5Tlb4

https://youtu.be/ykI3rj0qMI8


Edited by Ernest49 (05/24/22 08:39 AM)