Originally Posted By: spotstalkshootSeems ironic that someone from California(where vote harvesting is thought to be between 1 in 3-4 votes tabulated, would ignore the evidence of voter fraud. Sworn and notarized affiliates are evidentiary once presented to a court. Maybe ironic is the wrong term, moronic probably more accurate.
Apathetic?......or.....maybe complicit?
....and, like Forrest Gump, "that's all I have to say on the matter".
Regards,
hm