Quote:
How come the service rifle it does list is excatly the same as 223 remington?
Note the component listing. Does it say .223......or 5.56 NATO? My Hornady manual lists .223 components under the "service rifle" data. /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/wink.gif
Quote:
just curious to know why hornady says they are the same round with the only diffence being the service rifle data being 68 and 75 grain bullets due to the faster twist?
WHERE in your manual does Hornady say they are the same round? /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/confused1.gif
Hornady doesn't publish data under the category of "5.56NATO" or "5.45X45mm"....nor do any others that I am aware of. To clarify further, 5.56X45mm and .223 Remington are NOT the differences that are being discussed. 5.56 NATO MILITARY AMMUNITION is where the problem stems. That said...I have never seen any ammo marked 5.56X45mm that WASN'T military. /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/confused1.gif
What Hornady is doing is supplying load data for the 5.56 chambered rifles for those who want to load for "service rifle" competitions with the heavier bullets...using .223 components. This is likely done for 2 reasons: To publish data for the owners of "service rifles", and also to differentiate between the two rifles for LEGAL purposes. /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/wink.gif
Also, did you note the paragraph that says: "Reloaders are cautioned not to reload the 5.56x45mm beyond the AR-15's operating range lest case, barrel, and receiver life will be sacrificed"?
Noting that you have fired 5.56 NATO ammunition in your .223 chambered rifle is fine, as long as you are not trying to suggest that others do the same (and I saw that you did make a note of that). Just because a guy knocked down a hornet's nest with a stick and didn't get stung, that doesn't make it a safe practice.
There is a ton of information available by doing a Google search that will advise against shooting 5.56 NATO military ammo in a .223 Remington chambered rifle.