Outstanding News from the Supreme Court

hm1996

Moderator
Staff member
Quote:2 NEW YORK STATE RIFLE & PISTOL ASSN., INC. v. BRUEN
Syllabus
Held: New York’s proper-cause requirement violates the Fourteenth
Amendment by preventing law-abiding citizens with ordinary self-de-
fense needs from exercising their Second Amendment right to keep and
bear arms in public for self-defense. Pp. 8–63.

Outstanding News from the Supreme Court

Regards,
hm
 
this, combined with Heller, is a HUGE win for the gun owners of this nation.

i hate to use the term because it gets tossed around too easily, but this is quite literally a game changer for folks living in the anti-gun havens out there.
 
It is good news for sure, but I bet none of the commie states are going to bend over backwards to comply. They'll hang on and make would-be gun owners and carriers sue for every word, every syllable that's changed in their codes, and even then public officials will make it as difficult as possible.
 
And as Maxine Waters just said, " to H*** with the Supreme Court, we will defy them", that just shows that they have no respect for Supreme Court decisions, that is unless it is in their favor!
 
Originally Posted By: hm1996 Quote:2 NEW YORK STATE RIFLE & PISTOL ASSN., INC. v. BRUEN
Syllabus
Held: New York’s proper-cause requirement violates the Fourteenth
Amendment by preventing law-abiding citizens with ordinary self-de-
fense needs from exercising their Second Amendment right to keep and
bear arms in public for self-defense. Pp. 8–63.

Outstanding News from the Supreme Court

Regards,
hm

Patriots-1, commies-0
 
And another. This time the rogue agency known as the EPA as well as others.

Quote:

One more blockbuster Supreme Court decision could still be coming even after Friday's abortion ruling

Supreme Court's abortion ruling rocked nation last week but West Virginia v. EPA could also be huge

By Liz Peek

Believe it or not, overturning Roe v. Wade may not be the Supreme Court’s most dramatic decision this year. Instead, its ruling on West Virginia v. the Environmental Protection Agency could prove far more consequential. It could literally upend how our government works.

For the better.

West Virginia vs. the EPA asks whether important policies that impact the lives of all Americans should be made by unelected D.C. bureaucrats or by Congress. This SCOTUS could well decide that ruling by executive agency fiat is no longer acceptable.

WITH WEST VIRGINIA VS EPA, SUPREME COURT CAN RESTORE STATE AUTHORITY ON ENERGY

The case involves the Clean Power Plan, which was adopted under President Barack Obama to fight climate change; the program was estimated to cost as much as $33 billion per year and would have completely reordered our nation’s power grid. The state of West Virginia, joined by two coal companies and others, sued the EPA, arguing the plan was an abuse of power.

By deciding in favor of West Virginia, the court could begin to rein in the vast powers of the alphabet agencies in D.C. that run our lives and return it to legislators whom we elect to create…legislation. Just as the Supreme Court ruled in Roe v. Wade that abortion laws are more appropriately left up to the people’s elected representatives, it may decide in West Virginia vs. EPA that Congress, and not federal agencies, should write our laws.

A decision that puts Congress in charge would stall environmental rules intended to replace fossil fuels with renewable energy. Legislators, back in the driver’s seat, would have to debate and go public with the consequences – and costs -- of regulations that are now adopted with little buy-in from the public.

EPA SPENDS MILLIONS FROM BIDEN'S COVID BILL ON CLIMATE CHANGE PROGRAMS, EV RIDESHARES, 'PRUNING WORKSHOPS'

To further their climate agenda, Democrats have been able to hide the full-in price tag of abandoning oil and gas as our main energy sources by creating tax subsidies for renewables. If consumers had to pay the real cost of wind and solar power, they might not be so enthusiastic about what President Joe Biden calls the great "transition."

But the case goes beyond environmental regulations.

A ruling in favor of West Virginia would reverse a decades-long trend in which Congress has handed off to federal agencies decisions our legislators refuse or are unable to make. The usurping of authority by D.C. bureaucracies began with the New Deal in the 1930s, when an ambitious President Franklin D. Roosevelt led the way by creating the TVA, the WPA and a total of 69 other offices and executive branch agencies to do his bidding. The process occasioned Democrat Al Smith to complain that he was "submerged in a bowl of alphabet soup."

WASHINGTON POST COLUMNIST CALLS ON THE EPA TO REGULATE CARBON EMISSIONS AS A 'TOXIC SUBSTANCE'

Restricting the power of the alphabet soup authorities might require that our representatives and senators actually do their jobs, allowing less time for posturing and passing pointless dead-on-arrival bills. They might have to show up more than half the days in the year, for instance, which is the current norm.

It could, for sure, derail the ambitions of Joe Biden, who won no significant majority in Congress and appears incapable of "working across the aisle," though as Candidate Biden, he argued that ability was one of his strongest credentials.

Full Article: Fox News



 
Originally Posted By: ADKThank you President Trump!! Trump 2024,we need you now more than ever.

Bingo! libs, socialist/commies & anarchists. Destroying America from within.
 
Hope they get on this one quickly before the Dims get their act together and pack the court. You can bet that's high on their agenda.

Regards,
hm
 
The AG here has just told police chiefs to issue permits to any qualified applicants. Ours has been a "may" issue system almost as long as NY. Bracing now for roadblocks such as more training, higher cost, limits on where we can carry such as NYC is getting.
 
Back
Top