Originally Posted By: tnshootist
To my small mind it seems man has not been around to record weather cycles long enough to know much. Who can say that the climate does or does not change every ten thousand years or so.
and thats one of the BIGGEST issues with the climate narrative - the very limited dataset.
we have maybe 100 years of semi-accurate data, the older stuff being more inconsistent than current.
yet climate "scientists" (and i use that term VERY loosely) are making climate models off that small set of data for a planet that we have 10's of thousands of years of fossil record for.
of course, there are the vostok ice core data - but thats not live observation data. and while you can make a correlation from it, thats the best you can do.
and even then the politicians and media are cherry picking it to make things look as bad as they can... the Venice flooding for example. touted as the "worst in 50 years"... yet its still peaked around 4" below the 1966 floods - floods from 53 years ago.
or the company canada's weather ministry hired do do their climate modeling excluded 100 years of data in making their climate models up...
https://torontosun.com/opinion/columnist...-climate-change
just more proof that these climate change people love to tell a story, which may or may not actually be the WHOLE story.