THE FOUNDERS DIDN'T WANT AMERICANS ARMED WITH WEAPONS OF SPORT

hm1996

Moderator
Staff member
PRESS RELEASE



12500 N.E. Tenth Place • Bellevue, WA 98005 • JPFo_Org • 800-869-1884 • info@jpfo.org

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE • Oct 15, 2019 • Contact: Floyd Neeland

Robert Francis Couldn't Be More Wrong
THE FOUNDERS DIDN'T WANT AMERICANS
ARMED WITH WEAPONS OF SPORT

The "Nicknamed Candidate" has no clue about firearms
Our forefathers fought our British oppressors with weapons of war. The "Nicknamed Candidate" for president, this Beto fellow, thinks the Founders couldn't imagine us armed properly with weapons of war. We had the most sophisticated weapons of war imaginable in the late 1700s, weapons capable of fighting and defeating the most powerful army on the planet. That was the plan. It still is. The Second Amendment codifies this for the Militia--our People.

This person running for president as Beto must be a fool. His understanding of history stops short of any comprehension of why we are armed. We are armed as a balance of power, a threat to the existing order if it gets out of line. It keeps us free. You don't do that subarmed, with weapons of sport, or weapons of hunting ducks. Americans must have parity with police and infantry. To the extent we do not, we are subject to subjugation and frankly, that balance is slipping, and so tyranny creeps closer. Any careful observer can see that's true, and frightening.

Using a handful of psychotic maniacs who senselessly murder unarmed civilians as leverage to disarm the entire populace is emblematic of exactly who you do not want to elect or even listen to for advice. Asking the nicknamed candidate, riding a child's skateboard--which didn't even exist in Colonial times--for advice on how to run the country, is a fool's game. The fact that our so-called "news" media would give him serious consideration may be the second biggest problem we face. Not just fake news, but fraudulent reporting, misleading the body politic, using a putz as a pundit.
#####

Jews for the Preservation of Firearms Ownership, http://www.jpfo.org is America’s most aggressive civil-rights organization, dedicated to destroying the notion of “gun control” as any kind of credible public-policy position. So-called “gun control” does not control guns and doesn’t control criminal behavior. What it does is disarm the innocent, leaving them helpless in the face of criminals, tyrannical governments and genocide. History repeatedly proves this fact. Founded in 1989 by Aaron Zelman as a response to the Holocaust, JPFO speaks with the moral authority and tenacious commitment of survivors of persecution, and knows that surrendering your personal and family safety to government protection courts disaster. “You don’t have to be Jewish to fight by our side, you just have to love liberty.”

Regards,
hm
 

Personally I think if every household had a rifle and at least the head of household was basically trained to care for and shoot and qualified every so often the nation would be a more peaceful place.

Seems like the crazies only get that way in unarmed setting duck places.
 
Now for the reality check, a little prior history the National Firearms Act of 1934, the first federal gun-control law, which levied a restrictive $200 tax on the manufacture or sale of machine guns and sawed-off shotguns. This has been run through the courts several times. If I was betting, they could do the same with semiautomatic pistols, and all long guns to include your hunting rifle.

I also would bet they could jack that $200 tax to $2000, and still pass the smell test through the court system.
 
almost every gun design we have has been used in combat, in one form or another.

wars have been fought with bolt action rifles. lever actions were carried by our cavalry. semi auto handguns -the 1911 in particular- was designed for the US military. pump action and sawed off shotguns were carried in WWI and WWII

semi autos were used in WWII, though the AR15 and semi auto AK's that we have were not designed for the military and have never been issued to service members anywhere. they get full auto versions for that.

ANY weapon can be an assault weapon, depending on how it's used.

the 2nd amendment doesn't say a single word about hunting, deer or otherwise, or fun or sporting uses or competition.

beta is profoundly ignorant on guns in general as well as our existing gun laws. if he had a clue, he'd have something.

I'm convinced that he's not happy with sheila jackson lee being arguably the stupidest democrat out there and wants top spot for himself.
 
Back
Top