Predator Masters using UBB.threads ™ Infopop Corporation.
PM Gear Moon & Weather

Welcome to the Predator Masters Forums
Be sure to visit the main Predator Master website at

PM Gear
PM Gear
PM Gear
The Official Predator Masters Search Engine
Search Predator Masters

Topic Options
#3197856 - 03/14/19 07:35 PM Connecticut Supreme Court Allows Sandy Hook Parents’ Lawsuit against Gun-Maker to Proceed
hm1996 Offline
PM Junkie

Registered: 07/23/06
Posts: 15777
Loc: S. Texas
Connecticut Supreme Court Allows Sandy Hook Parents’ Lawsuit against Gun-Maker to Proceed

By Jack Crowe

March 14, 2019 12:19 PM

The Connecticut Supreme Court on Thursday ruled narrowly in favor of the parents of children killed in the 2012 mass shooting at Sandy Hook Elementary School, reversing a lower-court judge who’d dismissed the families’ lawsuit against gun manufacturer Remington.

A superior-court judge in Bridgeport initially dismissed the lawsuit in 2016 on the grounds that Remington, which manufactured the assault rifle used to murder 26 people at the elementary school in 2012, is protected by a 2005 law that provides “broad immunity” to gun makers and dealers when their weapons are used in crimes.

Justice Richard Palmer, writing for the 4–3 majority, reversed that ruling Thursday, finding that the plaintiffs, which include nine victims’ families and one survivor, should be given the opportunity to demonstrate that Remington violated the law by marketing the AR-15 specifically to young people.

“The regulation of advertising that threatens the public’s health, safety, and morals has long been considered a core exercise of the states’ police powers.” Justice Palmer wrote. “Accordingly, on the basis of that limited theory, we conclude that the plaintiffs have pleaded allegations sufficient to survive a motion to strike and are entitled to have the opportunity to prove their wrongful marketing allegations.”

Adam Lanza, then-20 years old, used his mother’s legally purchased Bushmaster XM15-E2S rifle in the December 14, 2012 attack. Joshua Koskoff, who represents the plaintiffs, has argued that the weapon was marketed as a military-style weapon and, as such, appealed to young, violent consumers.

“The families’ goal has always been to shed light on Remington’s calculated and profit-driven strategy to expand the AR-15 market and court high-risk users, all at the expense of Americans’ safety,” Koskoff said Thursday. “Today’s decision is a critical step toward achieving that goal.”

Attorneys for Remington maintain that the company cannot be held liable under Connecticut’s “negligent entrustment” law, as the plaintiffs suggest, because the company had no idea the weapon would end up in Lanza’s hands. A firearm seller must know or be “given a reason to know that the buyer is likely to use the product to cause harm,” in order to establish a negligent-entrustment claim, James Vogts, a lawyer for Remington, told the Wall Street Journal.

The NRA and other pro-Second Amendment groups have argued that the lawsuit, if successful, will expose the gun industry to “politically motivated predatory lawsuits” and irrevocably harm the ability of manufacturers and dealers to operate.

If what's ahead scares you and what's behind hurts you, look up; He never fails you.

If My people will humble themselves, pray, seek My face & turn from their wicked ways, I will hear from heaven & will forgive their sin & heal their land.

#3197912 - 03/15/19 07:18 AM Re: Connecticut Supreme Court Allows Sandy Hook Parents’ Lawsuit against Gun-Maker to Proceed [Re: hm1996]
masshunter Offline
Die Hard Member II

Registered: 12/10/08
Posts: 1132
Loc: western mass
If I'm not mistaken the lawsuit also involves the distributor, Camfour, for simply being the middleman.

#3197960 - 03/15/19 01:28 PM Re: Connecticut Supreme Court Allows Sandy Hook Parents’ Lawsuit against Gun-Maker to Proceed [Re: hm1996]
Plant.One Offline
Die Hard Member with a vengeance

Registered: 02/12/15
Posts: 4244
Loc: Oakland County, MI
from what i was reading/hearing regarding this - the only thing they're allowed to sue for was some advertising clause that Conn has.

the lawsuit claims that
Remington glorified the weapon in marketing it to young people.

The families alleged, for example, that the Bushmaster product catalogue shows soldiers on patrol in jungles along with the phrase: “When you need to perform under pressure, Bushmaster delivers,” and promotes the rifle to civilians as “the ultimate combat weapons system.”

of course - they also cite Lanza's easy access to his mothers guns as being part of the problem too. blink blink

which i suppose - when you kill your mom and steal the safe keys - is about as easy access as you can get.

All reloading info shared is based on my experiences in my guns. Follow safe reloading practice and work up loads from published minimum data.
This disclaimer will self destruct in 10 seconds.

#3198142 - 03/16/19 07:16 PM Re: Connecticut Supreme Court Allows Sandy Hook Parents’ Lawsuit against Gun-Maker to Proceed [Re: hm1996]
Stu Farish Offline

Registered: 04/22/01
Posts: 23514
Loc: Have gun, will travel
irf promoting the violent use of firearms is legally actionable, well, hollywood and the entire video game industry are next in line for such suits.
If a fire fighter fights fires, then what does a freedom fighter fight?

Keep calm and crazy on


Moderator:  DesertRam, Stu Farish 

© Predator Masters™, All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.