Originally Posted By: Cowboy43Originally Posted By: P&YOriginally Posted By: Cowboy43Originally Posted By: P&YThanks Cowboy, I would like to hear from members here though.
you just did. I told you it returns about as good as to be considered for what it is. If you're really that paranoid over it, go shoot a 3 shot group, unmount it and then reattach it and shoot another 3 shot group and you will have first hand experience at what's already been proven over and over. The Pulsar QD mount has been out for years and sees use daily on my gun. It works fine. It's no zero delta but it doesn't cost zero delta price either.
I was curious to hear other hunters experiences and opinions. Was looking for a bit more insight than "about as good as to be considered for what it is".
I can't go test my scope right now, it's on its way back to Pulsar. I'm also stuck pulling less than ideal shifts.
All that aside I still couldn't test it in numerous field conditions like others have.
Apparently I annoyed you with the question which was not my intention. im not annoyed at you more annoyed at seeing that same question being asked for years now. The video link i posted is prob one of the most comprehensive test done and really not much more needs to be done or said. He did a great test on that topic.
I get it. I answer the same old questions to rookies all the time and it gets old but things are always changing and people's mileage varies.
I also thought it was a very good review but in one environment by someone who may have a vested interest in the outcome.
More being said, like when you gave the example of one getting away, might not have needed to be said but was valuable to me.
In the future I will only try to post original questions. The question was not meant to annoy!