Hi ADK.
Firstly, you too are confusing Luciferians with Satanists. Because both terms are used by Christians to refer to their devil figure, this is a common mistake.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lucifer#In_Isaiah_14:12
When you base your entire argument on a false premise, you undermine the value of everything that follows.
If you build your house on sand etc.
Point 1: The purpose of the UN World Health Organisation is to enslave humanity under a Satanistic dictatorship? Really? I mean...really?
Your mistake in point 2 is another result of your conflation of the names Lucifer and Satan.
Point 3, I admit, has me confused. This is the first time I have ever heard anyone claim, even the Luciferians, that Luciferianism aims to see everyone homogenised. How you connect this with the United Nations Educational Scientific and Cultural Organisation is beyond me.
Point 4: You claim "Where God permits, encourages and rewards individual initiative, Luciferianism does not tolerate it in any shape or form." This is also the exact opposite of Luciferian principles, they are all about individualism and being free from constricting dogma.
Point 5 is yet another mistake directly attributable to the conflation of the two names.
Point 6: you are correct, Luciferians do believe in enjoying "carnal" pleasures.
Point 7: Russell's "The Impact of Science on Society" is a speculative treatise on what could be a possible result of a scientific oligarcy based on totalitarian systems like fascism or communism, not as you seem to present it as a direct prophecy of the results of some conspiracy against mankind. Just for clarity on this point here is the complete paragraph in context:
"A totalitarian government with a scientific bent might do
things that to us would seem horrifying. The Nazis were
more scientific than the present rulers of Russia, and were
more inclined towards the sort of atrocities than I have in
mind. They were said — I do not know with what truth — to
use prisoners in concentration camps as material for all kinds
of experiments, some involving death after much pain. If
they had survived, they would probably have soon taken to
scientific breeding. Any nation which adopts this practice
will, within a generation, secure great military advantages.
The system, one may surmise, will be something like this:
except possibly in the governing aristocracy, all but 5 per
cent of males and 30 per cent of females will be sterilized.
The 30 per cent of females will be expected to spend the
years from eighteen to forty in reproduction, in order to
secure adequate cannon fodder. As a rule, artificial insemina-
tion will be preferred to the natural method."
As to artificial insemination being made possible by "recent discoveries", it was first successfully performed on dogs by Lazzaro Spallanzani in 1780, hardly recent. We have been using this technique as a cost effective way to introduce new genetic lines in our Merino flock for decades.
Point 8 is all about Christian doctrine and not relevant to Luciferianism.
Point 9 is also a continued conflation of the names, Pike was a Mason who made the same conflationary mistake. You also directly quote, without attribution, from William Guy Carr.
Point 10 seems to suggest, by your use of the word goyim, the Jewish name for non-Jews, that Luciferians have some sort of Hebrew connection, more confusion.
Points 11 and 12 are yet more mistaken, or perhaps deliberate, conflation of Luciferian doctrine with Satanism. People always try to demonise that which they feel threatens them.
Point 13 is another complete opposite. Luciferianism sees women as equal to men in all ways, some even revere them as sacred. Your statement that "Today it has advanced to the stage where women have demanded the ‘right’ to adopt the same immoral codes as men" seems to suggest you don't believe they deserve these rights.
As to your conclusion; as most of what you have presented here seems to be drawn directly from readings of people like Guy Carr, a notorious conspiracy pedlar, Albert Pike the Freemason and borderline Satanist, and from Bertrand Russell taken totally out of context, and based on the mistaken conflation of Luciferians with Satanists, a group they see as similar to Christians in that they both feel the need to think of themselves as chattels of a superior being, I can only suggest further reading.
It is always tempting to be drawn to that which supports one's world view, but to be truly open minded one also has to study that which contradicts that view. In point 15 you claim " God’s plan of creation placed everything He created in perfect balance." if you only look for that which supports your view and ignore that which detracts, you can never achieve that balance.
It is obvious from your comment that your faith is a very important part of your life and the above is in no way intended to try to change or demean that faith or your need to hold it. I simply wish to suggest that a wider study seems in order.
Some of the most enjoyable and enlightening discussions I have had in my life were with people of faith who were also of the belief that there is nothing truly black or white in the world.
A late and great friend of mine was a Jesuit who firmly believed that his god created ALL men in his image, believers, non-believers, agnostics and even Luciferians, and that the concept of freedom of religion also meant the freedom from religion. He believed that if these differing philosophies were able to exist it was because his god wanted it that way.
