Who gave this guy his gun back ... twice?

Rocky1

New member
Quote:
Who gave this guy his gun back ... twice?

You won't believe the 'warning shots' he fired before airport attack

Published: 1/7/16

WASHINGTON – The case of Esteban Santiago, the 26-year-old shooter in the Fort Lauderdale-Hollywood International Airport massacre, gets stranger by the minute.

He flew from Alaska without checking any bags, other than the hard gun case he collected in baggage claim and opened to kill five people while wounding six others.

He was already being prosecuted for attacking his girlfriend and attempting to strangle her. He even broke the terms of his release on that charge by entering her home again. But he was allowed to keep his gun.

The FBI interviewed him in November after his employer in Alaska expressed concerns about things he was saying. He reportedly told the FBI he was being forced by the CIA to fight for ISIS. While being evaluated, the FBI took his gun. But they released him and gave it back after a psychiatric investigation that called for no followup and no medication.

He served in Iraq for the Army Reserves and the Alaska National Guard but was discharged for “unsatisfactory performance.”

He registered on MySpace under the name “Aashiq Hammad” and recorded Islamic religious music on the site three years before he ever deployed to Iraq. In 2007 he was posting on an explosives and weapons forum about mass-downloading Islamic terrorist propaganda videos. He also downloaded three songs – one of them titled “La ilaha illAllah,” which is Arabic for “There is no God but Allah” – the first half of the Muslim declaration of faith, the Shahadah. He lived within walking distance of Alaska’s only mosque.

“See Something, Say Nothing” exposes a federal government capitulating to an Islamic enemy within and punishing those who reject its narrative.

Investigators say he was planning the attack for some time – selling his possessions, including his car, and posting comments that, authorities say, indicate an extended period of preparation.

His family was pleading for help – warning of his instability, and friends in Alaska have told investigators that his behavior had grown erratic. His brother blames the FBI for letting him slip through their fingers.

Not exactly the boy next door who seemed so nice.

As a result of sheer federal governmental incompetence, once again, Santiago AKA Asshiq Hammad, was able to kill five and injure 6 in a shooting attack at the Florida airport Friday after all those “warning shots.”

Santiago emptied three magazines from his pistol, and then police ordered him to sit down, which he did. Police never fired a shot.

He was born in New Jersey and living in Alaska. He took Delta flight 1088 from Anchorage to Minneapolis-St. Paul Thursday night. He landed Friday morning, and then took Delta flight No. 2182 from Minneapolis-St. Paul to Fort Lauderdale.

He had checked his gun, picked it up at baggage claim, then went into the bathroom and loaded it. He came out and started shooting in Terminal 2.

Like the reporting you see here? Sign up for free news alerts from WND.com, America’s independent news network.

Florida Gov. Rick Scott held a Friday press conference and said he’d been in contact with President-elect Donald Trump and Vice President-elect Mike Pence, keeping both of them updated on the incident. He said he had not been in contact with President Obama.

A year ago this month, Santiago verbally assaulted his then girlfriend, a 40-year old mother of one child from a previous marriage, smashing through a locked bathroom door and telling her to “Get the f— out, [beeep].” After he forced his way in by breaking down the door, he smacked her in the head and attempted to strangle her. By the time police arrived, Santiago had fled the scene.

Santiago was arrested days later and released on the condition that he have no contact with the victim, but in February, Anchorage police found him at his girlfriend’s residence, and he was charged for violating the conditions of his release. That case is still pending with a scheduled court date in March.

Alaska court records show a criminal record under Santiago’s name for minor traffic infractions including operating a vehicle without insurance and a broken taillight. Records also show his landlord evicted him for non-payment of rent in February 2015.

Santiago served in the U.S. military, first in the Puerto Rico Army National Guard in 2007, according to the Department of Defense. He was deployed to Iraq in April 2010 as a combat engineer and returned to the U.S. in early 2011. In November 2014, after moving to Alaska, he joined the Alaska National Guard. According to a spokesperson for the Alaska National Guard, Santiago went AWOL several times before he was kicked out.

Santiago visited an FBI office in Anchorage in 2016, claiming voices were telling him to fight for ISIS. he also said he was being controlled by the CIA to watch ISIS videos. According to his aunt, Santiago became a father in September. More recently, he was hospitalized for two weeks.

“Like a month ago, it was like he lost his mind,” Maria Luisa Ruiz of New Jersey told the Bergen Record newspaper. “He said he saw things.”

The suspect’s brother, Bryan Santiago, said he believes the shooting rampage resulted from mental issues that surfaced after the Iraq tour.

Esteban Santiago requested medical help from army and federal agencies, according to his brother. He received some treatment.

“The FBI failed there,” his brother told the Associated Press, speaking in Spanish from Puerto Rico. “We’re not talking about someone who emerged from anonymity to do something like this. The federal government already knew about this for months, they had been evaluating him for a while, but they didn’t do anything.”


http://www.wnd.com/2017/01/who-gave-this-guy-his-gun-back-twice/
 
It's the 'common thread' that seems to run thru these mass shootings. The Feds. keep ignoring the numerous red flags. They just keep slipping thru the cracks.
frown.gif
 
So now he faces the death penalty. The USA is not allowed to make the drugs needed for lethal injection because of environmental regulation. The drug makers in Europe won't sell lethal injection drugs to the USA due to conflicts with their ethics on the death penalty.

He's going to need his gun back a third time.....with one bullet.




 
There are drugs for lethal injection. They are used everyday in Veterinary practices all across the U.S. They give the animal a sedative to relax them, and then the final shot which stops the heart. They pass on very quietly and peacefully. Way better then most of the monsters on death row deserve.

Public hangings in the town square would be good. It would send a message and a visual to all perspective murderers! But, I know, the liberals would have a fit!
 
drop him out of an airplane somewhere over the everglades.

twofer - he's gone forever, and nothing to clean up afterward, other than some alligator and snapping turtle turds.
 
Originally Posted By: BigSkyDogThere are drugs for lethal injection. They are used everyday in Veterinary practices all across the U.S. They give the animal a sedative to relax them, and then the final shot which stops the heart. They pass on very quietly and peacefully. Way better then most of the monsters on death row deserve.

Public hangings in the town square would be good. It would send a message and a visual to all perspective murderers! But, I know, the liberals would have a fit!

I think hanging on the public square is the right idea.
Capitol punishment is a serious matter. I think it should be used only when guilt has been proved beyond all reasonable doubt.

At that point it should be carried out on the public square.
If we as a society are not able to carry out the sentence of judge and jury in public maybe we shouldn't be doing it at all.

As in this case it would seem obvious there are mental problems but in this case does that make any difference.

The man was able to board planes,plan his acts and carry them out.

On execution my final question to ask myself,if I was making the decision of death,would be this. If this person were to gain their freedom somehow would there be reasonable danger they would commit similar acts again. If the answer is yes then death would be justified.

I don't think death should be the sentence unless the facts are not disputable. Years and years on death row is not swift and humane.

To live 20 or more years on death row is not much more risk that the rest of us have in regular life.

There are men in prison here in TN now that tortured and killed a young couple ten years ago. They got the death penalty.There is no doubt they did the acts.
They should have hanged before now.

There are four more in prison who claimed to be followers of the devil who kidnapped a family and shot mother,father,little girl and even 1 year old little boy. They should be gone already.

The only thing they have to offer is in their death maybe some young tough might have second thoughts about following their path.
 
Originally Posted By: OldTurtleThere is usually a reason that FBI agents are reassigned to Alaska,,,,Just saying....

I would not be to quick to blame the agent O.T.. I suspect the orders are coming down from Obama's Justice Dept.
 
Originally Posted By: tnshootist

I think hanging on the public square is the right idea.
Capitol punishment is a serious matter. I think it should be used only when guilt has been proved beyond all reasonable doubt.

At that point it should be carried out on the public square.
If we as a society are not able to carry out the sentence of judge and jury in public maybe we shouldn't be doing it at all.

As in this case it would seem obvious there are mental problems but in this case does that make any difference.

The man was able to board planes,plan his acts and carry them out.

On execution my final question to ask myself,if I was making the decision of death,would be this. If this person were to gain their freedom somehow would there be reasonable danger they would commit similar acts again. If the answer is yes then death would be justified.





right, in a case like this, where there's clear video evidence that the suspect is quite obivously guilty, there was enough planning to buy a one way ticket, and a semi admission of guilt, a swift death penalty following sentencing is in order.

you could walk him right from sentencing in front of the judge, outside to the rope and never have to worry about a appeals, etc.
 
Originally Posted By: FursniperSo now he faces the death penalty. The USA is not allowed to make the drugs needed for lethal injection because of environmental regulation. The drug makers in Europe won't sell lethal injection drugs to the USA due to conflicts with their ethics on the death penalty.

He's going to need his gun back a third time.....with one bullet.




Let Mr. Pruitt re-work the EPA. Then I bet we will have the drugs made here again. Or, we could just bring back the firing squad. That would be okay too.
 
Last edited:
Rocky, I wondered the same thing. How the heck was this guy allowed to keep his gun?

IMHO, the person or persons, who allowed this guy to keep his weapon....

.....after every time he committed domestic violence
.....after the FBI initially interviewed him, in November
.....even the shrinks, who decided he didn't need meds, or committed to an institution for mental help


IMHO, all of these people need to lose their jobs.

Why?
Because they obviously seen a developing problem, yet did nothing to help, or prevent the problem from getting worse.

The media keeps asking, "What was the motive?", for the shootings.

Well, media, the motive is quite simple (as I see it). The man is insane. That is the only motive needed.

And I find it somewhat ironic.....This guy used a handgun. Supposedly legally obtained, and owned.
I don't see anyone in the media, or in the political arena, screaming (this time) for guns to be banned.
Only (almost) pleading for this man to "finally get the help he evidently needs". (IMHO, it's because he wasn't shot and killed. If he would've been killed, then I bet the "ban guns" chants would be loud again.)
Had he used a rifle (regardless of type/brand), and taken into custody...there would've been another uproar about banning "assault weapons".
Yet, like I said, he used a handgun, so the crickets are chirping (for the most part).

Media hypocrisy knows no bounds.
 
I'm wondering how in the [beeep] you buy a one way ticket from Alaska to Miami, show up at the airport carrying nothing but a gun case, a handgun case at that, and Airport Security didn't have him stripped, tied spread eagle and doing a body cavity search with shoulder length gloves on.


EXCEPT... His name was Esteban Santiago.

And, he can't be picked on, because he's not white.
 
Originally Posted By: Rocky1I'm wondering how in the [beeep] you buy a one way ticket from Alaska to Miami, show up at the airport carrying nothing but a gun case, a handgun case at that, and Airport Security didn't have him stripped, tied spread eagle and doing a body cavity search with shoulder length gloves on.


EXCEPT... His name was Esteban Santiago.

And, he can't be picked on, because he's not white.

We don't profile in America Rocky, you know that.
crazy.gif
 
Back
Top