Actual ballistic coefficient?

KyleWoods

New member
Alright, as most of us know, the BC's published by the bullet manufacturer's are inflated slightly. My question is, is there a general rule of thumb to determine actual BC's? Like the actual is 90% of the published or something like that, or does it depend on the bullet? I'd like to get a reliable drop chart made up so I figured I would want the actual BC's and not the published.

Or are the published BC's close enough that it doesn't matter?
 
No formula for conversion. Depending on the bullet Brian Litz may have run testing on it. I can't think of the outfit he works for but a Google might work. Any specific bullet?

Greg
 
I was reading an article which I found after my interest was peaked by this thread. The article mentioned that under 600 yards there's really no difference. Of course that's if I read it correctly and am conveying it correctly.
 
If you do the math, at those distances BC will not make that much difference
It's the long range stuff where BC honestly comes into play


But the question here, is "are the published BC's useful" I would say for with your intended bullets and your intended ranges, I would rock with published BC's and worry about other things. If your talking about coyote hunting off sticks, you'll never notice the BC is right or wrong
thumbup1.gif
I mean we are talking about bullets who's BC are in the 2's.

I always shoot to confirm any data I make anyway, so I would make your drop chart and shoot to confirm and call it a day
 
Originally Posted By: Buster Hindend
I always shoot to confirm any data I make anyway, so I would make your drop chart and shoot to confirm and call it a day

this is a very key statement regarding this issue here.

when using stuff like ballistic calculators - a small (several precent) error in the BC is likely going to be the least of your concerns at (relatively) close range.

accuracy on data like scope height over bore, the actual velocity from a chronograph (vs whats written on the box) and other mechanical measurements that we as folks who are entering that data into the calculator are likely to present more of an issue to your drop table than using the BC numbers published by the bullet mfg.


just like any computer program, the more accurate you can be with as much of the data as possible, the better your output is going to be. but especially in this case, taking the above advice and confirming your data by real world shooting is going to give you the best result.

once you have real world data, you can tweak your shooting calculator drop table data to match the results you're getting in real life, but again in my experience those kind of corrections are made in areas other than worrying about the BC and Sectional density data on the bullet.

just make sure if you're using that mfg data, you're not putting it into the G7 BC (or other non traditional BC data) area of the data entry (if the program you're using has that option - for example i know Strelok only takes the traditional G1 data) and keep that data in the data entry position where it belongs
smile.gif
 
Back
Top