Got The Lion The Trapper Couldn't Get...

W

woodguru

New member
The trapper finally got her, she was a smart one and knew how to evade the dogs. My neighbor and I have lost at least eleven or more animals to just her and her cubs, and the trapper has had dogs on her four times, she was too wise as to how to go where the dogs can't.

This brings our lion count in less than two years to seven plus maybe some smaller half lions. Replacing goats and sheep is expensive, and our neighbors all have way less than they used to, most people are getting tired of feeding lions expensive animals.
 
Originally Posted By: sandy hicksIn the spirit of socialism. The lions need their fair share. You owe it to them.

My neighbor and I are of the opinion that if the animal rights liberals think it's okay for lions to eat our goats and sheep that they can give us a per diem for their buffet.

The neighbor at the end of the road lost seven sheep in one night, and then eight more three nights later ($3500+). This was this same female last year when she had 18 month old cubs and newer ones too. She apparently was teaching killing skills. That is why the trapper had so much trouble getting the mother lion, the dogs were on five lions the first time, which were hard to follow in different directions, then the young ones would tree but not the mother. This is why he was on her five times, one cub per time. He had previously taken some heat for taking a mother and two cubs at the same time.
 
Originally Posted By: woodguruOriginally Posted By: sandy hicksIn the spirit of socialism. The lions need their fair share. You owe it to them.

My neighbor and I are of the opinion that if the animal rights liberals think it's okay for lions to eat our goats and sheep that they can give us a per diem for their buffet.

The neighbor at the end of the road lost seven sheep in one night, and then eight more three nights later ($3500+). This was this same female last year when she had 18 month old cubs and newer ones too. She apparently was teaching killing skills. That is why the trapper had so much trouble getting the mother lion, the dogs were on five lions the first time, which were hard to follow in different directions, then the young ones would tree but not the mother. This is why he was on her five times, one cub per time. He had previously taken some heat for taking a mother and two cubs at the same time.

Wait...you have more animals than your neighbor? That's not right! give him half of yours! Isn't that how you socialists think?
I find it hilarious that you say "animal rights liberals", as though there is a distinction in LIBERALS. YOU are all the same. If you vote for them and defend them, YOU are part of the problem, not part of the solution. the only way that we as Americans will be able to express our free will is to vote the liberals, ALL liberals, out of office.

Your attitude shows the EXACT problem with the socialist mentality.

So enlighten us woodless, HOW can you be a socialist if you do not agree with what the socialists do? The conundrum MUST be driving you crazy....

THAT would explain things about you.
 
All liberals are the same. They preach tolerance and diversity... unless it doesn't agree with their particular agenda. Then dammit, you're just flat wrong. Everybody knows that.
smile.gif
 
Originally Posted By: AzDiamondHeatOriginally Posted By: woodguruOriginally Posted By: sandy hicksIn the spirit of socialism. The lions need their fair share. You owe it to them.

My neighbor and I are of the opinion that if the animal rights liberals think it's okay for lions to eat our goats and sheep that they can give us a per diem for their buffet.

The neighbor at the end of the road lost seven sheep in one night, and then eight more three nights later ($3500+). This was this same female last year when she had 18 month old cubs and newer ones too. She apparently was teaching killing skills. That is why the trapper had so much trouble getting the mother lion, the dogs were on five lions the first time, which were hard to follow in different directions, then the young ones would tree but not the mother. This is why he was on her five times, one cub per time. He had previously taken some heat for taking a mother and two cubs at the same time.

Wait...you have more animals than your neighbor? That's not right! give him half of yours! Isn't that how you socialists think?
I find it hilarious that you say "animal rights liberals", as though there is a distinction in LIBERALS. YOU are all the same. If you vote for them and defend them, YOU are part of the problem, not part of the solution. the only way that we as Americans will be able to express our free will is to vote the liberals, ALL liberals, out of office.

Your attitude shows the EXACT problem with the socialist mentality.

So enlighten us woodless, HOW can you be a socialist if you do not agree with what the socialists do? The conundrum MUST be driving you crazy....

THAT would explain things about you.


Now this is funny, I have been giving him goats, seriously...
He lives lower than me between where the lions hang out and come from. The lions eat his animals first, when they eat all his they come up and get mine. Sooo... I make sure he has three or four goats. "lol"
 
Originally Posted By: woodguruOriginally Posted By: AzDiamondHeatOriginally Posted By: woodguruOriginally Posted By: sandy hicksIn the spirit of socialism. The lions need their fair share. You owe it to them.

My neighbor and I are of the opinion that if the animal rights liberals think it's okay for lions to eat our goats and sheep that they can give us a per diem for their buffet.

The neighbor at the end of the road lost seven sheep in one night, and then eight more three nights later ($3500+). This was this same female last year when she had 18 month old cubs and newer ones too. She apparently was teaching killing skills. That is why the trapper had so much trouble getting the mother lion, the dogs were on five lions the first time, which were hard to follow in different directions, then the young ones would tree but not the mother. This is why he was on her five times, one cub per time. He had previously taken some heat for taking a mother and two cubs at the same time.

Wait...you have more animals than your neighbor? That's not right! give him half of yours! Isn't that how you socialists think?
I find it hilarious that you say "animal rights liberals", as though there is a distinction in LIBERALS. YOU are all the same. If you vote for them and defend them, YOU are part of the problem, not part of the solution. the only way that we as Americans will be able to express our free will is to vote the liberals, ALL liberals, out of office.

Your attitude shows the EXACT problem with the socialist mentality.

So enlighten us woodless, HOW can you be a socialist if you do not agree with what the socialists do? The conundrum MUST be driving you crazy....

THAT would explain things about you.


Now this is funny, I have been giving him goats, seriously...
He lives lower than me between where the lions hang out and come from. The lions eat his animals first, when they eat all his they come up and get mine. Sooo... I make sure he has three or four goats. "lol"

didn;t answer the question there woodless. You are right though, it IS funny that you continue to spread your special brand of manure thinking we all enjoy your stink.

Answer the question woodless.
 
Originally Posted By: AzDiamondHeatOriginally Posted By: woodguruOriginally Posted By: sandy hicksIn the spirit of socialism. The lions need their fair share. You owe it to them.

My neighbor and I are of the opinion that if the animal rights liberals think it's okay for lions to eat our goats and sheep that they can give us a per diem for their buffet.

The neighbor at the end of the road lost seven sheep in one night, and then eight more three nights later ($3500+). This was this same female last year when she had 18 month old cubs and newer ones too. She apparently was teaching killing skills. That is why the trapper had so much trouble getting the mother lion, the dogs were on five lions the first time, which were hard to follow in different directions, then the young ones would tree but not the mother. This is why he was on her five times, one cub per time. He had previously taken some heat for taking a mother and two cubs at the same time.

Wait...you have more animals than your neighbor? That's not right! give him half of yours! Isn't that how you socialists think?
I find it hilarious that you say "animal rights liberals", as though there is a distinction in LIBERALS. YOU are all the same. If you vote for them and defend them, YOU are part of the problem, not part of the solution. the only way that we as Americans will be able to express our free will is to vote the liberals, ALL liberals, out of office.

Your attitude shows the EXACT problem with the socialist mentality.

So enlighten us woodless, HOW can you be a socialist if you do not agree with what the socialists do? The conundrum MUST be driving you crazy....

THAT would explain things about you.



You show a kind of obtuseness that is impossible to respond to in an intelligent way.
lol.gif


Are you serious with this liberal/political BS attached to a conversation about a lion depredation problem?

Go back to ignoring me like I ignore your senseless posts. You have nothing to say that's worth hearing, as exemplified here.
 
Last edited:
Originally Posted By: AzDiamondHeatOriginally Posted By: woodguruOriginally Posted By: AzDiamondHeatOriginally Posted By: woodguruOriginally Posted By: sandy hicksIn the spirit of socialism. The lions need their fair share. You owe it to them.

My neighbor and I are of the opinion that if the animal rights liberals think it's okay for lions to eat our goats and sheep that they can give us a per diem for their buffet.

The neighbor at the end of the road lost seven sheep in one night, and then eight more three nights later ($3500+). This was this same female last year when she had 18 month old cubs and newer ones too. She apparently was teaching killing skills. That is why the trapper had so much trouble getting the mother lion, the dogs were on five lions the first time, which were hard to follow in different directions, then the young ones would tree but not the mother. This is why he was on her five times, one cub per time. He had previously taken some heat for taking a mother and two cubs at the same time.

Wait...you have more animals than your neighbor? That's not right! give him half of yours! Isn't that how you socialists think?
I find it hilarious that you say "animal rights liberals", as though there is a distinction in LIBERALS. YOU are all the same. If you vote for them and defend them, YOU are part of the problem, not part of the solution. the only way that we as Americans will be able to express our free will is to vote the liberals, ALL liberals, out of office.

Your attitude shows the EXACT problem with the socialist mentality.

So enlighten us woodless, HOW can you be a socialist if you do not agree with what the socialists do? The conundrum MUST be driving you crazy....

THAT would explain things about you.


Now this is funny, I have been giving him goats, seriously...
He lives lower than me between where the lions hang out and come from. The lions eat his animals first, when they eat all his they come up and get mine. Sooo... I make sure he has three or four goats. "lol"

didn;t answer the question there woodless. You are right though, it IS funny that you continue to spread your special brand of manure thinking we all enjoy your stink.

Answer the question woodless.



See above, I did

If you don't enjoy it don't read it, didn't your mother teach you anything when you were in kindergarten?
 
Yes, my mother taught me not to lie. Clearly yours didn't.

she also taught me reading comprehension.

You DIDN'T answer the question. Again. You have NEVER answered the question which has been asked NUMEROUS times.

I will ask again, and I will keep it simple so you can understand it.

How can you profess to be a socialist(your words, a claim you have proudly made on this very website), support them, defend their agenda, attack the conservative belief system, and all the while come on here and pretend to be a gun owner and a hunter?

We will wait for that answer.
 
Originally Posted By: woodguruOriginally Posted By: AzDiamondHeatOriginally Posted By: woodguruOriginally Posted By: sandy hicksIn the spirit of socialism. The lions need their fair share. You owe it to them.

My neighbor and I are of the opinion that if the animal rights liberals think it's okay for lions to eat our goats and sheep that they can give us a per diem for their buffet.

The neighbor at the end of the road lost seven sheep in one night, and then eight more three nights later ($3500+). This was this same female last year when she had 18 month old cubs and newer ones too. She apparently was teaching killing skills. That is why the trapper had so much trouble getting the mother lion, the dogs were on five lions the first time, which were hard to follow in different directions, then the young ones would tree but not the mother. This is why he was on her five times, one cub per time. He had previously taken some heat for taking a mother and two cubs at the same time.

Wait...you have more animals than your neighbor? That's not right! give him half of yours! Isn't that how you socialists think?
I find it hilarious that you say "animal rights liberals", as though there is a distinction in LIBERALS. YOU are all the same. If you vote for them and defend them, YOU are part of the problem, not part of the solution. the only way that we as Americans will be able to express our free will is to vote the liberals, ALL liberals, out of office.

Your attitude shows the EXACT problem with the socialist mentality.

So enlighten us woodless, HOW can you be a socialist if you do not agree with what the socialists do? The conundrum MUST be driving you crazy....

THAT would explain things about you.



You show a kind of obtuseness that is impossible to respond to in an intelligent way.
lol.gif


Are you serious with this liberal/political BS attached to a conversation about a lion depredation problem?

Go back to ignoring me like I ignore your senseless posts. You have nothing to say that's worth hearing, as exemplified here.

And yet you still respond, but not intelligently as you admitted would happen.

I will start ignoring you as soon as you stop being a socialist troll. For the record there genius, I was responding to the fact that YOU brought up the idiot liberal agenda. It is BEYOND ironic. Maybe you don't even read your own diatribe. How about you go back and read all your posts. More proof you have NO idea what you spew.

Quick, start another clueless rant......
 
You got to give it to woody, he takes a lick and keeps on coming back with more crap over and over. Some would say he is brave, he is brave like the Caitlyn Jenner of pm.. I woulda have gave up and just stop posting but not him
 
Last edited:
Originally Posted By: AzDiamondHeatYes, my mother taught me not to lie. Clearly yours didn't.

she also taught me reading comprehension.

You DIDN'T answer the question. Again. You have NEVER answered the question which has been asked NUMEROUS times.

I will ask again, and I will keep it simple so you can understand it.

How can you profess to be a socialist(your words, a claim you have proudly made on this very website), support them, defend their agenda, attack the conservative belief system, and all the while come on here and pretend to be a gun owner and a hunter?

We will wait for that answer.



I admit to being a socialist in the democratic sense that we are a socialist country in regard to programs like unemployment, social security, medicare, disability, etc. Democrats such as Sanders that have guts have always admitted this, that this society has socialist elements...he took a position that the likes of you will never get.

Meanwhile ignorant people equate the term with McCarthy type nuances like communism and socialism in the communist sense. Some people hear the word socialist as something it is not in context to this country, they see the shades of Nazi communist Germany.

Because I can see and acknowledge the reality of parts of our country and the facts about what these programs are does not make me a socialist in the context you mean socialist. You say it as the bad word as in communist type socialist, and I am not that nor have I ever said I was.

Arguing with you sir is like arguing with a mentally retarded and ignorant fool. Your arguments are circular, and your statements to the effect I pretend to be a gun owner is the height of being wrong in a way I can prove, and have proved in the past to the gunbroker crowd who were worse than you. I have people near me that want to shoot coyotes here, and I'm sure I'll have a chance to show off guns and hunting gear.

There is a reason I rarely answer you, it doesn't make sense to respond to people who are as clueless as you, engaging with you brings me down to your level, and I just don't choose to go there.

Once again you have entered into a conversation that you did not enter in order to engage in a meaningful or constructive manner toward the conversation at hand, but only to attack and belittle me.

I will ask you again to please ignore my posts unless you have something meaningful to add. You are tiresome and I'm sure others notice it as well. I will make note again that I would appreciate moderators looking at this thread and the manner in which you entered, and that they advise you to stop engaging me as you are. You add nothing to this site, and you make it a place where people are afraid to weigh in with their opinions if they don't agree with the small handful of those like you that have another point of view and resort to attacks and insults.
 
Originally Posted By: shawn@moYou got to give it to woody, he takes a lick and keeps on coming back with more crap over and over. Some would say he is brave, he is brave like the Caitlyn Jenner of pm.. I woulda have gave up and just stop posting but not him

I actually learn about gear and techniques when I ask questions, (when the mastaazzblastas azzdiamonds leave them alone) and I read a lot of fun and informative posts that I have nothing to add to. And I communicate with people behind the scenes.

Not brave, just smart enough to not care when being hassled by ignorant fools. The smart person considers the source and reacts accordingly, which is to say doesn't react when there is nothing to react to.
 
Originally Posted By: woodguruOriginally Posted By: AzDiamondHeatYes, my mother taught me not to lie. Clearly yours didn't.

she also taught me reading comprehension.

You DIDN'T answer the question. Again. You have NEVER answered the question which has been asked NUMEROUS times.

I will ask again, and I will keep it simple so you can understand it.

How can you profess to be a socialist(your words, a claim you have proudly made on this very website), support them, defend their agenda, attack the conservative belief system, and all the while come on here and pretend to be a gun owner and a hunter?

We will wait for that answer.



I admit to being a socialist in the democratic sense that we are a socialist country in regard to programs like unemployment, social security, medicare, disability, etc. Democrats such as Sanders that have guts have always admitted this, that this society has socialist elements...he took a position that the likes of you will never get.

Meanwhile ignorant people equate the term with McCarthy type nuances like communism and socialism in the communist sense. Some people hear the word socialist as something it is not in context to this country, they see the shades of Nazi communist Germany.

Because I can see and acknowledge the reality of parts of our country and the facts about what these programs are does not make me a socialist in the context you mean socialist. You say it as the bad word as in communist type socialist, and I am not that nor have I ever said I was.

Arguing with you sir is like arguing with a mentally retarded and ignorant fool. Your arguments are circular, and your statements to the effect I pretend to be a gun owner is the height of being wrong in a way I can prove, and have proved in the past to the gunbroker crowd who were worse than you. I have people near me that want to shoot coyotes here, and I'm sure I'll have a chance to show off guns and hunting gear.

There is a reason I rarely answer you, it doesn't make sense to respond to people who are as clueless as you, engaging with you brings me down to your level, and I just don't choose to go there.

Once again you have entered into a conversation that you did not enter in order to engage in a meaningful or constructive manner toward the conversation at hand, but only to attack and belittle me.

I will ask you again to please ignore my posts unless you have something meaningful to add. You are tiresome and I'm sure others notice it as well. I will make note again that I would appreciate moderators looking at this thread and the manner in which you entered, and that they advise you to stop engaging me as you are. You add nothing to this site, and you make it a place where people are afraid to weigh in with their opinions if they don't agree with the small handful of those like you that have another point of view and resort to attacks and insults.


Ah....no. No matter how you try and "spin" what you have said(how very liberal of you), you cannot change the truth.

A democrat IS a democrat. A socialist IS a socialist. I am sorry the definitions are so distasteful, but that IS what they are and it IS what you are by your actions and own admittance.

Lie all you want, call names, throw tantrums, cry like a baby(in other words act like the socialist lkiberal you are) but the truth will not change.

Try to keep up. I will ask AGAIN, since it is what YOU have said. How can you profess to be a gun owner and outdoor enthusiast when you vote for the very people who take away those rights?

Answer the question.

 
Originally Posted By: woodguruOriginally Posted By: shawn@moYou got to give it to woody, he takes a lick and keeps on coming back with more crap over and over. Some would say he is brave, he is brave like the Caitlyn Jenner of pm.. I woulda have gave up and just stop posting but not him

I actually learn about gear and techniques when I ask questions, (when the mastaazzblastas azzdiamonds leave them alone) and I read a lot of fun and informative posts that I have nothing to add to. And I communicate with people behind the scenes.

Not brave, just smart enough to not care when being hassled by ignorant fools. The smart person considers the source and reacts accordingly, which is to say doesn't react when there is nothing to react to.

You are not even smart enough to realize you just called yourself an ignorant fool.....

The gig is up woodless. You have been exposed. Again.

One last thing. It has been said before, but since you are obviously a little slow I will say it again: if you don't want to be called out for posting crap, STOP POSTING CRAP!

Even my children learned how to use a toilet and stopped messing their pants.
 
Come on I make a jenner joke and I dont get a half laugh! And woodum was ok being called jenner (just not brave) and still no laughs! Tough crowd!! Or im the only one that thinks im funny.
 
Originally Posted By: shawn@moCome on I make a jenner joke and I dont get a half laugh! And woodum was ok being called jenner (just not brave) and still no laughs! Tough crowd!! Or im the only one that thinks im funny.

Nah, that WAS funny. My bad for not giving props, I was distracted...hey, you are right, woodless IS just like Caitlin. It has no idea what it really is and makes humiliating public displays to get attention!

You NAILED it Shawn!
 
Back
Top