Originally Posted By: Andrew06I got very serious about the diamondback hp scopes, until I checked them out in person. I found the glass to be extremely poor. Low light performance was poor, resolution low, and even some fish eye effect at lower magnifications. The build quality is also noticeably lacking. I found them plasticky feeling, and unattractive.
Please keep in mind the current Leupold VX-2 is light years beyond the vx-ii, so do not hold any opinions about the older model against the vx-2. I ended up buying a VX-2 in 6-18x40 with the long range garment reticle for $550 out the door. It is obviously more expensive, but its more than twice the scope. The glass is light years ahead of the vortex, and the overall feel and fit/finish is incomparably better. Comparing the two was like driving a geo metro to a BMW dealership for a test drive.
You will hear rants about Vortexs warranty, and how they replace all of the defective scopes without hassle. This tells me a: they are not serviceable, rather disposable. And B: that they cost very little to import from the lowest bidder overseas.
My thoughts as well. Mediocre glass at best, and the adjustments aren't much better. IMO, the Vortex rifle scopes worth owning start at the Viper PST and higher. This coming from a guy that killed 3 Viper PA scopes, one of which was on a 223.