BREAKING NEWS!!! FBI"No AR used in Naval Yard Shooting!"

hm1996

Moderator
Staff member
Fox News just had an FBI spokeswoman with an updated report on the Naval Yard shooting. She said:

"There have been numerous erroneous reports as to the weapons used in the NY shooting. As far as we have determined, the shooter entered building 197 armed with a shotgun. Sometime after the shooting started, he obtained access to a handgun. There was no AR 15 rifle used in the shooting "

So far have not found a video or link to written report.

The quote may not be verbatum but is accurate to the best of my memory.

Does it surprise anyone that the evil black rifle was blamed in ALL initial reports? Couldn't be someone has a hidden agenda here, could it?
cursing.gif


Regards,
hm
 
Quote:CNN: AR-15 Was Not Used in Navy Yard Shooting

Katie Pavlich | Sep 17, 2013

UPDATE: The FBI has confirmed Alexis did not have an AR-15 during the incident but instead had a shotgun.
"We do not have any information as this time Mr. Alexis had an AR-15."


According to CNN, Navy Yard shooter Aaron Alexis didn't use an AR-15 to carry out his rampage as previous media reports stated.





Last night on his show, CNN's Piers Morgan had a meltdown over the AR-15 and repeatedly misled and lied to viewers not only about the types of firearms used, but where they were purchased. Morgan claimed Alexis purchased an AR-15 legally in Virginia, which is completely false. Alexis did legally purchase a shotgun in Virginia after passing an FBI background check and then illegally brought it into Washington D.C. and into the Navy Yard.

http://townhall.com/tipsheet/katiepavlic...ooting-n1702425

Regards,
hm
 
That's just the media's way of paying tribute to the democrats and o. Being it reported it is basically accepted as fact. A page 78 retract won't matter. The problem could come up that a shotgun is just as deadly as a AR15 so they should be banned also, nothing over single shot .410's for bird hunting.....

I actually lived on a island for 5 months where nothing over a .22 caliber rifle and nothing more than a .410 were legal. They had to be registered, that included storage in the Police Dept if you left the island. No one could use your registered gun unless it was re-registered to that person. I guess it could be worse, no guns at all.
 
On a brighter note... Every time the morons go off on a tangent like this, and they are proven wrong, it discredits their cause.

The biggest issue in this one right now, the one we should all be screaming at the top of our lungs about in reply to their allegations, is the fact that this guy has had a long standing history of mental defect and violence, and numerous arrests, and none of it showed up in his background checks.

His father indicated to Seattle Police in 2004, that Aaron Alexis had Anger Management issues. This was after he had shot out the tires on a construction worker's car, and it was made note of in the investigators' report. But... No charges were filed in that incidence. Hmmmm... maybe if the system hadn't failed, he would have been charged, he would have been locked up, he would have had a record that showed up on a background check, and that would have prevented him from legally purchasing a firearm. He would have had a record that prevented him from having security clearance to be in the Naval Yard also.

The lack of formal charges in that incidence allowed him to join the Navy. His background check there turned up nothing, allowing him a "Secret" security clearance. Two independent background checks commissioned by his employer in the last month, failed to turn up any of THREE previous run-ins with the law, all of violent nature, or the fact that he was currently undergoing psychiatric treatment. ALL OF WHICH would have shut his security clearance down. Had they not negotiated his early discharge, under honorable conditions, rather than issuing a General Discharge over Disciplinary issues, this too would have shown up on his background check, and shut down his security clearance.

He just had a background check performed for purchase of the shotgun 2 days earlier, and that background check came back clean. If any of his 3 arrests had had formal charges filed, he wouldn't have been allowed to purchase the shotgun. If his psychiatric treatment showed up, he wouldn't have been allowed to purchase the shotgun.

Bottomline is, the system failed in every respect in this one. Their supposed Universal Background Checks are ludicrous in practice, as a preventative tool, as was most judiciously proven in this case. The shooter Aaron Lewis has had 3 background checks performed since August, and NONE OF THEM have shown any of his prior arrests for gun, or other violence, NONE OF THEM have shown any indication of his violent tendencies, NONE OF THEM have shown any indication of his long standing mental defect, NONE OF THEM have shown any indication he was undergoing psychiatric treatment.

So, the pulpit is now ours to use gentlemen, it is now time to ask, at every turn, how much safer is society going to be with Universal Background Checks in place?? Aaron Alexis with 3 prior arrests for violence, 2 of those with a firearm, a checkered military career, a long standing background of mental defect, currently undergoing psychiatric care, has undergone 3 background checks in the last month, and NONE OF THEM have turned up a damm thing to deny him access to a firearm, or a SECRET military security clearance, because the system is broken.

I think it's time to tell the anti-gun liberal crowd to go find another horse to whip, they've run this one into the ground.


 
Originally Posted By: Stu Farisharrests & charges will not deny a purchase. convictions do.



Yeah, but you have to be charged to be convicted.
 
Back
Top