I like the idea a lot and when I see one in person, I may buy it. But I have LOTS of concerns about the 10/22. Namely, do I have to add an aftermarket trigger, barrel, and stock to get it to hit anything?
I had a 10/22 way back in the 1980s and straight out of the box I tried every possible combination of ammo. The best it would do was tennis ball sized groups at 50. Now kids, I'm not the best shot in the world, but if I can put 5 shots inside of a nickle at 100 with the Savage .22-250 I owned back then, I sure as [beeep] feel I'm entitled to say that that Ruger 10/22 was a POS. So I dumped it.
Then in the late 1990s, I got to thinking maybe it was just bad luck. Everybody seemed to love the 10/22, so I gave them another try. Well, the new one was better, but not very [beeep] much better.
Of course, all the 10/22 guys are telling me I should put a custom barrel on it, custom trigger, custom stock, etc and then it'll be a real shooter. Well, yeah, no schmidt Sherlock. If you rebuild the whole [beeep] gun, it'll be a whole new gun. Seemed like a freaking turd polishing exercise to me, so I sold the SOB off again.
Am I nuts for expecting that the take down will be any better?
To MPFD, I'd add that once upon a time, takedown rifles were much more common. The idea was to make a gun that was easier to travel with, both in a car and on a train. Since we're talking about a time before states required guns to be cased when in a car, once at the destination the gun could simply be kept assembled and used.
You'll notice that a lot of older .22 rifles had a takedown version and also, of course, many shotguns came with a takedown "car case".
The advantage I can see now is that it would be possible to fly with the gun inside a piece of checked luggage. Obviously, following all rules/laws, but there is no rule that says you must use a case that screams "Firearms Inside!".
Grouse