Zeiss Conquest

Taxed,
I have one and consider it a GREAT scope,especially for the money.

I bought 3 new scopes last year>burris black diamond 4x16-50mm,nikon monarch 5.5x16 44mm and the zeiss.
A friend bought a Leupold 4.5x14 50mm for his 270,we compared them all.He reluctantly agreed the zeiss was "as bright or brighter than the big 50mm scopes.
Not to be the type to say I PICKED THE BEST,the order was zeiss,then the burris,leupold and nikon were neck and neck.

Try dnrsports>$581 I payed $629 for mine.
You won't be sorry...ME
 
Thanks, those were the three scopes that I was trying to decide amoung. Although I think I had it narrowed to the black diamond or the Zeiss. I prefer the side focus. I don't think the Monarch has that option.
 
The black diamond is WAY too big imo.
The side focus is the only way to go,it will spoil you..
The nikon is a good deal for the money,it's on my 17hmr.
 
thanks for input... think i'll go with the Zeiss. I've never had a sidefocus, buts is got to be better than the objective focus. Found some on ebay in the $500+/- range.
 
Back
Top