Holder Plays New Race Card

azmastablasta

New member
Them dirty, low down racists want to force you to prove you can legally vote.

Holder to black leaders: 'Sacred' right to vote under attack

By JOSEPH WILLIAMS |
5/30/12 11:28 AM EDT

Attorney General Eric Holder told a council of African American church leaders Wednesday that the "sacred" right to vote is under assault nationwide, with federal lawsuits and at least a dozen state laws that could hinder - or block – minorities’ access to the ballot box this fall.

"In my travels across this country, I’ve heard a consistent drumbeat of concern from citizens, who – often for the first time in their lives – now have reason to believe that we are failing to live up to one of our nation’s most noble ideals,” Holder said in a speech before the Council of Black Churches. The threats of legal assaults and lingering discrimination, he added, means that “some of the achievements that defined the civil rights movement now hang in the balance.”

As if to underscore the point, however, a voting rights group is worried that Holder and the Justice Department aren’t acting quickly enough to stop Florida’s Republican governor from continuing a purge of registered voters from the state’s rolls because they lack proof of U.S. citizenship.

The Advancement Project accuses Gov. Rick Scott, a Republican, of taking an end run around Voting Rights Act provisions to keep minorities from voting, and calls on Holder to immediately block it. “We are particularly concerned about the impact of this election year’s voter removal practice on eligible voters of color protected under the Voting Rights Act, given Florida’s documented history of erroneous discriminatory purges in the past,” according to the May 17 letter.

“The right to vote is the cornerstone of our democracy and every eligible citizen deserves an opportunity to participate,” said Judith Browne Dianis, co director of Advancement Project, a civil rights organization that works to protect voting rights. “Overly broad purges during election years are dangerous in that they can wrongfully deny access to the ballot to large numbers of American citizens who are eligible voters. This process unfairly targets Latino voters and must end immediately.

In Florida, “there’s a history of preventing eligible citizens from voting in presidential election years,” Dianis said. “In 2000 and 2004, the state used a flawed method to come up with a listing of people believed to be ineligible to vote due to past felony convictions and sought to purge them from the rolls. Tens of thousands of voters were illegitimately disenfranchised including those listed who had been granted clemency and had their rights fully restored.”

Access to the polls is becoming a highly contentious issue ahead of the 2012 election between President Barack Obama and his GOP challenger, Mitt Romney – a contest most political analysts believe will be decided by a razor-thin margin. Republican governors and lawmakers at the state level have pushed through numerous laws and executive orders designed to eliminate voter fraud, proposals which Democrats say are unnecessary and will effectively suppress turnout among minorities and others.

With new laws and old struggles as a backdrop, Holder’s speech before the Council of Black Churches was a call to arms, reminding the audience of its history fighting for equal voting right for minorities.

The attorney general told them his office is "aggressively" taking on the task of protecting that right, including challenging several state lawsuits that would overturn key provisions of the Voting Rights Act involving redistricting in Southern states and strict new voter ID laws that strips away the guarantee of equal access to the ballot box in the 2012 election.

Ensuring that everyone who is qualified can vote "is one of our highest priorities," Holder told the council, adding that during his watch the Justice Department has taken on more than 100 cases involving voting within the past year, "a record number." Since President Bush re-authorized the Section 5 provision of the Voting Rights Act, which requires some Southern states to get federal approval before making broad changes to laws involving voting, "it has consistently come under attack by those who say it is no longer needed."

Holder also rejected conservatives' contention that making it easier to vote invites fraud, a key argument in calling for tougher voter I'd laws. Recalling that protesters and faith leaders faced violence and death to gain that right during the 1960s civil rights movement, Holder called on black churches to mobilize as an ally of the Justice Department, informing the larger community and pushing back against restrictive proposals.

"We have to honor the generations that took extraordinary risks" to guarantee equal access to the polls, Holder said. The nation has made tremendous progress, he added, but "this fight must go on."

http://www.politico.com/politico44/2012/...der-124823.html
 
You can't buy alcohol, cigarettes, enter a casino, cash a check, drive a car, buy a hunting or fishing license, get on an airplane, get a library card, rent a video, or just about anything else in this country without some form of id.

The claim that voter id laws disenfranchise voters is so transparently false that it makes you wonder why Democrats are so opposed to it. For me, it raises the question of just how much voter fraud are the Democrats engaged in that they feel this issue is so important?
 
Originally Posted By: IversYou can't buy alcohol, cigarettes, enter a casino, cash a check, drive a car, buy a hunting or fishing license, get on an airplane, get a library card, rent a video, or just about anything else in this country without some form of id.

The claim that voter id laws disenfranchise voters is so transparently false that it makes you wonder why Democrats are so opposed to it. For me, it raises the question of just how much voter fraud are the Democrats engaged in that they feel this issue is so important?

Lots.
 
Originally Posted By: IversYou can't buy alcohol, cigarettes, enter a casino, cash a check, drive a car, buy a hunting or fishing license, get on an airplane, get a library card, rent a video, or just about anything else in this country without some form of id.

The claim that voter id laws disenfranchise voters is so transparently false that it makes you wonder why Democrats are so opposed to it. For me, it raises the question of just how much voter fraud are the Democrats engaged in that they feel this issue is so important?

Why is it that the democrats are so adamantly opposed to Voter ID reform? As stated above, you need ID to do any number of things today but the only thing the libs want you to be able to do without an ID is vote or run for office? If it smells like a dead fish, it is a dead fish!

Holder refuses to prosecute NBPP members who were caught on tape intimidating white voters in Philadelphia, yet refuses to prosecute but has no problems filing multiple lawsuits against Texas, Fl. etc. etc. when they pass laws requiring ID to vote. I smell a dead fish!

Quote: Eric Holder: Black Panther case focus demeans 'my people' -

Josh Gerstein:

Attorney General Eric Holder finally got fed up Tuesday with claims that the Justice Department went easy in a voting rights case against members of the New Black Panther Party because they are African American.

Holder's frustration over the criticism became evident during a House Appropriations subcommittee hearing as Rep. John Culberson (R-Texas) accused the Justice Department of failing to cooperate with a Civil Rights Commission investigation into the handling of the 2008 incident in which Black Panthers in intimidating outfits and wielding a club stood outside a polling place in Philadelphia.

The Attorney General seemed to take personal offense at a comment Culberson read in which former Democratic activist Bartle Bull called the incident the most serious act of voter intimidation he had witnessed in his career.

"Think about that," Holder said. "When you compare what people endured in the South in the 60s to try to get the right to vote for African Americans, and to compare what people were subjected to there to what happened in Philadelphia—which was inappropriate, certainly that…to describe it in those terms I think does a great disservice to people who put their lives on the line, who risked all, for my people," said Holder, who is black.

Holder noted that his late sister-in-law, Vivian Malone Jones, helped integrate the University of Alabama.

"To compare that kind of courage, that kind of action, and to say that the Black Panther incident wrong thought it might be somehow is greater in magnitude or is of greater concern to us, historically, I think just flies in the face of history and the facts.," Holder said with evident exasperation.

In a series of questions and comments earlier in the hearing, Culberson insisted that race had infected the decision-making process. "There’s clearly evidence, overwhelming evidence, that your Department of Justice refuses to protect the rights of anybody other than African Americans to vote," the Texas Republican said. "There's a pattern of a double standard here."

“I would disagree very vehemently with the notion that there’s overwhelming evidence that that is in fact true,” Holder replied. “This Department of Justice does not enforce the law in a race-conscious way.”

Rep. Chaka Fattah, a Democrat from Philadelphia, said the Black Panthers "should not have been there." But he said the GOP was making too much out of a fleeting incident involving a couple of people.

"The most unethical thing a person can do is make allegations based on absolutely nothing," Fattah said. "The only issue of race is singling out this particular decision...That this rises to national significance is bogus on its face."

UPDATE: This post has been updated with minor changes to the syntax of some quotes.

http://www.politico.com/blogs/joshgerste..._my_people.html

Life-begins1.jpg


Regards,
hm
 
Quote:Why is it that the democrats are so adamantly opposed to Voter ID reform?....Simple....Look to past history when the big Democratic political "Machines" were (still are in some locales) very energetically 'buying' votes for their candidates and would bus potential voters from one precinct to another with questionable residential documents....or the IDs of those residing in the local cemetery....

Photo identification tends to reduce this probability and might just be cause for a reasonably 'honest' election until they can get the computerized voting machines accepted in all precincts, where a few key strokes on a 'hacked' system can determine an election's outcome...
 
I.D.?

What's that?

I just used mine when i went to get plates for my new jeep because i had to write a check!!

No shirt, no shoes, no I.D. = no service!
 
Photo identification tends to reduce this probability and might just be cause for a reasonably 'honest' election until they can get the computerized voting machines accepted in all precincts, where a few key strokes on a 'hacked' system can determine an election's outcome...

Good point OT. I can't understand why they keep harping on this ID thing. As was posted here sometime back, the gubmint has arranged for vote tabulation to occur in Spain and the info is not retrievable here if any glitch occurs. Follow the money and you can be assured there is a link to Soros. It doesn't really matter if any ghetto goblins don't have ID since the vote can be easily manipulated in Spain.

http://www.westernjournalism.com/spanish-company-will-count-american-votes-overseas-in-november/
 
AZ,I a time of sorry stuff this is really sorry.Have we already lost the right to have free elections even including the fraud?Anyone who thinks on line stuff is safe under any security program is fooling themselves. I am thinking the x in the box with a #2 is still the best bet who cares how long it takes to count votes,as long as they are counted correctly,and anyone who has ever had to manage information knows a paper trail is the only safety net that works for all parties.JMO
 
The same guy who refused to prosecute a member of the Black Panthers, who was caught on video outside a polling place threatening elderly white voters with a club and preventing them from voting, is worried that black voters will be disenfranchised if everyone is required to show id to vote?

Eric Holder should be prosecuted for conspiracy to commit voter fraud, along with lying to Congress about his knowledge of "Fast and Furious".

The US Supreme Court has ruled that voter id requirements are constitutional so long as the id's are free to poor voters, or they are allowed to cast provisional ballots and given ample time to prove their identity. So the question isn't about the constitutionality of voter id laws, or voter disenfranchisement, or civil rights. The issue is the Democrats' hissy fit over their growing inability to swing tight elections using voter fraud.

This is the most corrupt administration in US history. They make Nixon's administration look like choirboys.
 
Last edited:
Ivers,O just said he was going to be open,he did not say he would not be corrupt.So what we got was the most openly corrupt admin.ever.
Really I have seen corruption in about all politics in my life,but I don't think I have ever seen a bunch so open about it.I guess that's Chicago politics?
 
Last edited:
Originally Posted By: tnshootistIvers,O just said he was going to be open,he did not say he would not be corrupt.So what we got was the most openly corrupt admin.ever.
Really I have seen corruption in about all politics in my life,but I don't think I have ever seen a bunch so open about it.I guess that's Chicago politics?

AMEN
 
Back
Top