dogmessiah,
I like the Warne Quick Detach rings. I have them on three different rifles right now, and my son has a set on his CZ .375 H&H. A word of caution about using the Warne rings - they grip tight, so you have to be careful when tightening the screws. Too much can result in a crushed scope tube. My son's .375 H&H was having problems with scope slippage in the CZ rings, so he put the Warne Quick Detach on it and hasn't had a problem since.
My go-to predator hunting rifle is a 6x45 Dtech AR, and I use the ultra high Quick Dtach rings on it. I have removed the scope several times and then replaced it. After checking zero again and again after several removals, I haven't had to re-adjust at all. It holds zero really well. I always like to confirm zero, but so far I haven't had a problem with it. I'm confident enough now that if I do remove the scope and then replace it, I wouldn't hesitate to go hunting without checking it if I didn't have time to check zero again.
The Warne rings are solid, heavy and well-made. I think you will like them if you need to switch scopes out for different loads.
This is the Remington Model 7 I mentioned earlier, .243 and a Nikon Prostaff 3x9. The tactical base is an EGW.
Weatherby Vanguard Sub-MOA, .338 Win. Mag, Warne Quick Detach rings, Leupold 2.5x8
Warne Quick Detach Ultra-High on a Detech AR, 6x45, Mueller 3x10 Sport Dot scope
Ak4wd,
I'm glad to hear the report about the 85 gr. TSX. That's quite a performance to tackle a grizzly with such a small bullet. My experience has been limited to a .338 Win Mag and a .300 Rem Ultra Mag. They are real winners in those calibers.
What suprised the heck out of me is the accuracy of the TSX. I uesd the old X bullets years ago and never got decent accuracy with them. They penetrated well but just wouldn't group worth a hoot. The same is said for any Partition bullet I have ever fired in a variety of calibers, I just couldn't get the desired accuracy I was looking for. The TSX has changed that.