Cheney whupped the redheaded stepchild!!

Guys take a look at all the reports comming out. Which said IRAG had no WMD's or did it have the capability of producing any. Also, this was stated as being a directed result of the UN inspections after the first gulf war. It did say however that it was BELIEVED the he(Sadam) would try to pursue these weapons if the sanactions were lifted and the inspections ceased. HOWEVER, Neither of these two would have happened if the inspections had continued.

It puzzles me bound all reason to wonder how anyone could think that Iraq was the most serious threat facing our country 2 years ago enough to START a war there. When the FACTS are comming out every day showing there were no weapons. GUYs dont you remeber Bush speech explaining that IRAQ was A "CLEAR AND GATHERING THREAT"? I am not sure what "CLEAR" means to GB but to me NOW its about as Clear as mud. About what the presidents reputation is now. The bad thing is its just not his reputation he has tarnished but the Americans peoples reputation as well.
Can u guys not see this????
 
It is not as simple as saying OPPS our bad!!! Or no weapons are there but we did a great thing and were better off without him, BS. THESE REPORTS CLEARLY SHOW this to be FALSE!!!
 
So the reports show that we are not better off with Saddam gone? Hmmm, you read like you spell.

"Opps" my bad, I thought you supported John Kerry and John Edwards and their stance on the War in Iraq. You seem to have an independent view that conflicts what Kerry/Edwards believe. You seem to think that given the intelligence on the table in 2001 that there was no reason to invade Iraq and you seem to think that there was no proof of WMD then either. See, this makes you look even more ignorant (if thats possible) because even your liberal canidates voted for the war and each stated themselves how Saddam was a "Clear and IMMINENT" threat to Americans lives here and abroad. Then there is the biggest liberal proponant of George Bush's decision to go into Iraq, whats his name, oh yeah BILL CLINTON. Clinton said "There is no way Bush could stand by without making a move in Iraq" but of corse he had just spent 8 years standing by doing nothing.

Liberals want it both ways, good lingquists can achieve this (Ex: Clinton) but illiterate ones can't (Ex: KY).
 
JRB that boat dont float!

Clinton, Clinton, Clinton

That is where republicans look to lay blame. Just so happens Clinton is already be portrayed by many as one of the best Presidents this Nation has ever had. It was very suprising to me that he beat Bush in 96. But he did and won relection with ease. Granted he did not have 9/11 to deal with but if Bush had spent less time vactioning and more time working he would have seen what his top advisors told him ablut bin ladden b4 he attacked us. Hind site is 20/20. THe character of a man is demonstrated by his actions, or his lack there of and so is his Judgement. Can anyone here honestly say that Iraq was the country to deal with in 02? Oh before it was an intelligence failures which in part is true. But it also A FACT guys that Richard Clark gave a detailed report to the administration that Bin Ladden was a threat and nothing was done about it?
 
but if Bush had spent less time vactioning and more time working he would have seen what his top advisors told him ablut bin ladden

More pulling information from Michael Moore instead of reliable sources. Speaking of vacationing, which two senators have among the worst attendance records in the senate? Hmm, missing 30 of 33 votes comes to mind, wonder who vacations most? Laughable.

"Can anyone honestly say Iraq.." How many times are you going to type "can anyone honestly say"??? Yes everyone involved in the presidential campaign THOUGHT and KNEW and STILL SAYS that Iraq was the country to invade in 02'. Everyone, Kerry, Edwards, Bush, Cheney.. They all supported the invasion, they had the intelligence in front of them THEN and they made the DECISION THEN. There is no argument here unless you have some third party candidate to support... who are you trying to insinuate would have handled anything any differently? Kerry has said the intelligence was actionable, Clinton has said it was actionable, that just tells you how SERIOUS the threat was... if those liberals were ready to jump then it must've been seriuos.

You are unable to see past your own ignorance KY, you DON'T KNOW what the information was that they had laid out in front of them before casting their vote. You don't even know how your candidate voted in the senate about these issues. You truely are sad in your own way, you are trying to pull for Kerry but you dig his hole deeper and fail to make a single point relevant to this presidential election. Laughable.
 
JRB your previous post is so full of BS that that Bobcat style loader portrayed earlier in this post couldnt handle it. From the contents of your most recent posts it is obvious that you are becoming desperate. Is it the fact that things ARE LOOKING really bad for Bush? Well of course it is!!!
 
Here is the INFORMATION thing again flawed data by an FEDERAL agency that Bush has the power to control? Go figure. He is fading fast just look at his most recent Claim America will be less safe if you elect John Kerry! What a croc. Even republican anaylst are sayomg Bush is flirting with disaster with this claim. It is obivious that it is a last ditch effort to hopefully safe his relection hopes. Guess what it ant gonna happen CAPTAIN!!!
 
Originally posted by KyCoyoteHunter:
[qb]JRB your previous post is so full of BS that that Bobcat style loader portrayed earlier in this post couldnt handle it. From the contents of your most recent posts it is obvious that you are becoming desperate. Is it the fact that things ARE LOOKING really bad for Bush? Well of course it is!!![/qb]
Click to expand...
Support the content of this post wtih some sort of facts or prepare to talk to echoes in this forum.
 
Can anyone honestly say Iraq.." How many times are you going to type "can anyone honestly say"??? Yes everyone involved in the presidential campaign THOUGHT and KNEW and STILL SAYS that Iraq was the country to invade in 02'. Everyone, Kerry, Edwards, Bush, Cheney.. They all supported the invasion.

Kerry voted to give Bush the authority to go to war if neccessary. The intelligence issue JRB is a double bladed sord. Bush has tried to argue it but when Kerry uses it to give him the AUTHORITY to go to war if need be. NEED BE JRB not because of other personal reason that I have discussed befroe.

JRB
Tell me exactly what it is that you are afraid of.
You say Michael Moore is a loon and you are not watching his movie. How can a person who has such strong political conviction such as yourself not watch it? GOOD OR BAD, no matter what opinion you take from it, it is worth seeing. You seem to have plenty of time to post on here surely your time is not so valuable that you can spare 2 hours and 2 minutes to watch it. Are you afraid it may raise questions in your own mind and you stanchly refuse to watch it?
 
To finish my incoplete thought, double bladed in that Kerry could and has used it to say thats why he voted to give Bush the authority to go.

The fact is not in the vote for Authority to authorize force, THE TRUE ISSUE lies where Bush rushed to War without UN support along with other nations as well. It is obvious THAT bush did not persue all avenues before rushing to war JRB.

THE MAJORITY OF AMERICAN PEOPLE SAW THIS DURING THE FIRST DEBATE.
 
KY, is this the same U.N. that includes the following countries that have TAKEN ILLEGAL PAYOFFS from IRAQ: Germany, France, China, the same ones who were against action being taken agains Iraq? The same U.N. being ran by Kofi Anan, who's son also received bribes illegally from Iraq, the same U.N. who BASTERDIZED the "Food for Oil" program? If it is the same U.N., no further explanation is needed now is it you MORON!
 
HOWEVER, Neither of these two would have happened if the inspections had continued.
Click to expand...
Ahh! There in lies the rub. Saddam had dispelled the inspectors from Iraq. That is one of the reasons action was taken.

Just so happens Clinton is already be portrayed by many as one of the best Presidents this Nation has ever had.
Click to expand...
Many who? Historians, or Democrats like yourself? If you are going to state something as fact, give the source of those facts. Or did you just make that up?

THe character of a man is demonstrated by his actions, or his lack there of and so is his Judgement.
Click to expand...
KCH- you are as inconsistant in your comments as Kerry is. If you really believed what you just said, you would disgusted with the person that you earier discribed as "one of the best presidents this nation has ever had".

Bin Ladden was a threat and nothing was done about it
Click to expand...
You conveniently forget that Clinton did absolutely nothing to reduce the threat imposed by Bin Laden. Is this one of the reasons that "Clinton is one of the best presidents this nation has ever had"?

To finish my incoplete thought,
Click to expand...
If only you had ever had a complete thought, maybe you would make more sense.
 
Back
Top