U.N. call for world government

SavTxCajun

New member
This is a WorldNetDaily printer-friendly version of the article which follows.
To view this item online, visit http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=35596


Friday, November 14, 2003
--------------------------------------------------
Socialists, U.N. call for world government----------------------------------------------------------
Posted: November 14, 2003
1:00 a.m. Eastern By Henry Lamb
© 2003 WorldNetDaily.com

Concluding its 22nd global congress in Sao Paulo, Brazil, recently, Socialist International issued its Declaration calling for implementation of "global governance," in a program that mirrors the recommendations of the U.N.-funded Commission on Global Governance, published in 1995.

The International Socialists call for: expanding the U.N. Security Council; creating a new Economic Security Council; creating a new World Environmental Organization; and the mechanisms necessary to enforce "Sustainable Development" worldwide.

This document makes public the close union between the agenda of International Socialists and the agenda for global governance developed by the United Nations. Previous efforts to keep the "socialist" label away from the U.N., have now been abandoned, and both institutions are publicly seeking total global governance through the United Nations.

Though the document does not mention the Bush administration by name, it decries obstacles to the new world order, sought by the socialists. Article Three of the Declaration says:

Neoconservatives are attempting to ... dismantle all forms of global governance, to minimize the role of the United Nations, to undermine multilateral institutions, to promote unilateralism and the consecration of the market, and to impose the will of the powerful to decide the future of mankind.

The president of Socialist International, Antonio Guterres, former socialist prime minister of Portugal, said the "Bush administration was impeding efforts to establish a new world order," according to the Denver Post (Oct. 30, p. 21A).

Specifically, the socialists want the new Economic Security Council to be a "Council for Sustainable Development – that would coordinate sustainable development on a global scale ..." and, to implement the Kyoto Protocol.

Socialists want to consolidate the U.N. Environment Program, and all the existing environmental treaties, under the enforcement authority of a new World Environment Organization, the same function the Commission on Global Governance proposed for the outdated U.N. Trusteeship Council.

This document also endorses: the U.N. Millennium Development goals adopted in 2000; the U.N.'s Monterey Consensus, adopted in 2002; and the U.N.'s Plan for Sustainable Development, adopted in Johannesburg in 2002. It calls for the elimination of agricultural subsidies in the U.S., Europe and Japan, and free exportation by developing countries into these markets, and international control of " ... regulation, accountability and supervision of financial systems to enhance the prospects for sustainable growth and development."

Socialist International links "exacerbated nationalism ... and xenophobic attitudes," with terrorism, as "threats to peace," which must be addressed only by an expanded U.N. Security Council, with the authority and means "to act to preserve and enforce peace," which "must be carried out in accordance with the decisions of the United Nations."

The [Socialist] International, therefore, believes that reform of the United Nations cannot be delayed any longer and will continue to be strongly engaged in the process. Achieving lasting peace and security requires that the United Nations Charter be updated to meet today's new challenges, and that the Security Council be reformed to make it more representative, democratic and responsive.

The "reform" called for by the U.N.'s Commission on Global Governance, and by the U.N., would expand the Security Council in number, whose members would serve rotating terms, remove the "Permanent Member" status from the U.S., France, England, Germany and China, and would eliminate the veto power of any single nation.

The socialists want the U.N. to place "greater emphasis on the provision of global public services, especially with regard to sanitation, health care, child-care facilities, education, employment promotion and environmental protection."

In a clear statement of support for the socialist model of economic organization, rather than the capitalist model, the document says:

The principle of public service cannot be sacrificed to the consecration of the market. Tax systems should also be adapted to promote better public services and a new global tax should be created to fund the global public goods.

The "new global tax" endorsed by this statement is discussed at length throughout U.N. literature and is a series of taxing proposals ranging from a tax on international currency transactions (the Tobin Tax), to a tax on resource use, and use of the "global commons," which includes the air, space, oceans and the airwaves used for radio, television and Internet transmissions.

This global taxing authority was included in the first draft of the recommendations of the U.N.'s High Level Panel on Financing Development, meeting in Monterey, Mexico, in 2001. It was removed, at the insistence of the new U.S. delegates, appointed by the Bush administration. The panel remains in place, however, to seek independent financing of U.N. operations.

Socialist International is the world's largest political organization, according to its website, working through more than 140 national organizations. Its largest affiliate in the United States is the Democratic Socialists of America, which says it is "building progressive movements for social change while establishing an openly socialist presence in American communities and politics."

The "social change" described here is the global governance agenda developed jointly, and now publicly advanced by both the United Nations, and the Socialist International.------------------------------------------------------------------

Henry Lamb is the executive vice president of the Environmental Conservation Organization and chairman of Sovereignty International.

Forwarned is forarmed.
 
I hate liberals and socialist scum!

What I can't hate? Maybe, I should be more sensitive.

I can't be angry? Maybe, I should go to anger management and learn how to control a natural human emotion.

I can't offend someone? Maybe, I should keep it all bottled up and go postal.

This is what the world is coming to? I don't want any part of the U.N. or any other nation that can't stand up for themselves.
Ohhh...wait we call them democrats here.

Ben
 
I have written the President, (now that we have one again) and all my representatives demanding we get out of the un and get the un our of the USA. Got some replies, but nothing sensible to me.
Barry
 
I have nothing against Socialism. In fact I think it is good for some countries. We're not one of them. Personally I wish the United Nations would just disappear from the U.S. Put it in Paris so the French can foot the bills for awhile. The U N and Chiriac deserve each other. I'm tired of seeing us voted down all the time by a bunch of banana republics that are contributing litle or nothing to this supposed world order. There, now I fel better. Best wishes.

Cal - Montreal
 
Barry you got that right for sure. Seems to vanish at an alarming rate every day. Not too many seen to notice or care. I am sure our founding fathers are spinning in their graves.
Barry
 
OK,I'll go out on a limd here.
Would,nt it be cool to see a dozen real Americans storm the senate while in session,lock the doors and demand the Constitution be followed?It would be really tough to pull off after 9/11 but I think its the only way Liberty will not be forsaken. Man I would love to have a face to face talk with Ted Kennedy about socialism,soverntry,our open borders,gun rights,taxes,immigritation, and the list goes on.Sad to say but as long as we have TV and its used as a brainwashing tool for the left,we have no chance of taking our country back.Alot of our fellow Americans have no thinking skills of their own and are incapable of saying anything contrary to what Hollywood or Oprah puts out.
These Liberal judges need a mil-dot on a vital area as legislating from the bench is not a part of their job.Tar and feathering at the very least.
If the crap ever hits the fan you can bet we will have UN-Peacekeepers from another nation on our soil to defend the elite.The US Government knows it could not count on our military to kill US civilians over something they themselves believe in.
I wish I could say this rant made me feel better but whenever I take a look at the reality of the situtation it reminds me The end of our Nation is near. At least you would'nt be able to reconize it. /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/confused.gif
 
If the crap ever hits the fan you can bet we will have UN-Peacekeepers from another nation on our soil to defend the elite.The US Government knows it could not count on our military to kill US civilians over something they themselves believe in.
This is exactly the kind of "house-to-house" combat training the UN troops are receiving right here on U.S. soil. The UN has fortified Military bases here in the U.S. where this training is being accomplished.
 
Have you ever taken the oath?

If you haven't had your right hand raised and stood infront of a Commissioned Officer and repeted the oath, Please feel free to do so now.

Your reply will be considered your word of honor.
Raise your right hand, stand and repeat the following,

I, (state your full name), do solemnly swear that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; and that I will obey the orders of the President of the United States and the orders of the officers appointed over me, according to regulations and the Uniform Code of Military Justice. So help me God.

Enlisted Oath of office for the U.S. Military (Army)

Now we can't go around just shooting whoever we want, but we sure as hell can vote and help put those in office that have better ways of getting things done than the liberials.

So get on with it and write and write and write those that help make a difference. Help elect those like Bush.

Just be sure that if ever the ballon goes up we'll be the first they come for.

Keep your powder dry and the wind to your face.
God Bless Ya.
 
Could it be that statements made here could fall under the juridiction of Patriot Act? Maybee not under Bush, but I can think of others who'd use it in a split second.Intresting isn't it.So who are the real enemies of our constitution? Some rag head who exsplodes himself and inocents up in an act of stupidity ? Or polititions who's only goals is to become more powerful at the cost of our freedoms, using any and every exscuse to deny us our rights.Yes the UN is a threat,but its our own elected officials who choose for it to be so. Without our support it would crumble as the USSR did .We are loosing ground in our fight to retain our constitutionaly given rights.Our public schools have become the training ground for "One Worldness".Adolf Hitler once told an adult German " I care little for which you think of me,for your children , through our public schools will
grow up to love me"
 
SVT,the Republicans have had the Pres,house and senate for a while now and look what they've accompolished.Still open borders,no[very few] conservative judges confirmed,15-billion to Africa to stop aids[yea,right],I could keep on but its pointless.Bush's stance against Islam has been OK but the rest of his agenda is pure socialism except for the tax cuts which wont be implimented fully for ten years and I suspect never will.
Now we can't go around just shooting whoever we want, but we sure as hell can vote and help put those in office that have better ways of getting things done than the liberials.
I used ot think the very same thing,I was estatic when the Republicans won control of everything.I though OK,now we will make some changes.Its the same old crap.To me;I cant see where voting for either of these parties is making any diffrence to you and I maintaining our freedoms as written in the Constitution.Our country was not found on socialist principles.The new medi-care drug plan ring a bell,4+billion.Please show me where Im wrong.I wont to be wrong.I still see it slipping away.By the way,I never said to shoot anyone.Just to observe them through a mil-dot retical all the time watching a vital area.You know you can get one installed in a Lupy spotting scope by Premiere. /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/wink.gif Got to go,the NSA is knocking at the door.
 
barry206,

Yes it sounds futal, but I work at trying to put the right person in the right place.

Yes, things wont change unless all of us make a better showing at the polls.

Certin rules in the way the House and Senate vote must change amoung other things.

It comes down to what we want to make it and still be careful of what we wish for.

Good Hunt'n to Ya.
 
Putting the right person in the right places usualy gives way to votting for the lesser of two evils around votting time.You want to make a statement to these socialist republicans who have taken over the party ?Don't vote for them !They have shown there total disregaurd for the conservative wing of the party.It's time to let them know that we are activly supporting a 3rd party canadate.Oh yes I can already hear it from the party elites " Do you want that liberal Democrate in the White house, cause thats what you get when you vote 3rd party" Hell, I don't care if he's Democrate or Republican. If he champions socialism I won't vote for him or her.
 
Mo,you da man.Neither of these parties represent us anymore.But I dont think a third party could make it with the media scrutney that would envail it.Remember Pat B.Ask most Americans about the things that are wrong with this country and they reflect P.Buch's ideas the most.Its the constant hammering of the TV-set that scares most people away eventhough they know its right.Five years ago I worried for my grandkids future,now I think it will happend during my life.New World Order,the credits are about to roll.
 
Back
Top