"Why? See the above posted ballistics which you yourself admited whooped up on the .257 Roy (or your .25-06AI)... using the same case."
Oh, I aint bitchn, The numbers are outstanding, As I said "azz whooped"
Aint looking for anything magical, just checkn "facts".And Ive been stating facts all along, just wanting to look for more facts too. Your 264 beats out my 2506AI because the VLDs in your cartridge have a so much higher BC. This got me wondering though. Considering I can set here and look at these bullets and see how sleek and streamlined they are, "why are the BCs so low"? Its just something I need to do for myself and would apreciate it if you'd do the same with your 264 just for reference.
Then Im being beat up on my load data because I have a longer barrel but you guys wont give me the extra velocity of the Magnum case?
I aint bitchn though, for the monent, Im sayn "azz whooped". I am on the other hand loading up some experimental ammo for some more load calculations cause everything said here is just say-so. Im going to do some footwork before I jump into building another cartridge. Ive got the tools, Im just going to put them to work for me.
Then I got to thinking, Why is this even bothering me? Their is only .007" difference in the bullet diameter...LOL
Maybe its the tone of my writing but, like I say, I aint bitchn, just lookn for more facts and this is how we gettem.