What a Horrible Woman

Well the American people keep putting these people in place, they don't ask questions and let them get away with this madness at the tax payers expense. Sad that the few that care can't be heard over the noise of the ones that stand behind these unamerican two lagged pieces of crap.....
 
Last edited:
Just another example of the most open and honest administration in history.

I would guess HB likes his leaders elitist and arrogant.

The main point is there was absolutely NO REASON for all those people to go. Not to mention the irony of all the "carbon emissions" for so many worthless people to attend a gathering on reducing carbon emissions.

Liberals have gotten their following so dumbed down they don't even have to be sly anymore.

Come on hunterbear, if anyone has to explain to you why this is theater of the absurd I have been giving you too much credit for intelligence.
 
Last edited:
Your points are well taken, Bill. I'm simply pointing out that this is standard operating procedure for members of Congress. Liberals are certainly no more 'dumbed down' than the 'conservative' base that supported 8 years of the Bush administration spending like drunken sailors.
 
If the Bush administration is characterized as "spending like drunken sailors", then how would you describe the Obama administration? I am lost for words when it comes to describing that bunch, except the usual terminology such as communist, socialist, or even an extreme progressive!
 
hunterbear,
Your arguement might hold water if the current administration and congress hadn't outspent Bush by a large margin. Don't even say they had to, that's crap.
 
You are certainly correct. I prefer to compare Bush spending to the administrations that preceded it. I can't pretend that the Obama administration is fiscally responsible. However, conservative implies that an administration will be fiscally conservative. A liberal administration can be expected to spend liberally. The government, despite its ability to print money at will, should be required to operate within a sustainable budget.There are many tough choices that should be made, but we will get politics as usual. I personally would be willing to make concessions on social programs for a balanced budget.Democrats feel they must deliver on social programs or face dire consequences at the polls. I am not so partisan that I can't see the need for fiscally responsible leadership. My point is that the GOP has not recently supplied that type of leadership.
 
Nobody faces dire consequences at the polls anymore. Most all Americans that vote, vote straight party lines. I cannot fathom how any gun owner could support a Democrat who supports gun control. Heck, are their any that don't? Abortion is murder, America calls it a choice. Why don't we drug test people who are on welfare? If you are on welfare and don't take drugs, what's the big deal? Every company that I know of pratices routine, random drug tests on all their employees, why should those paid to live and not work by the Federal government be subjected to less than the people who pay the taxes that support them? Until recently with the economy like it is, there has never been a time in my adult life where someone that wants to work, couldn't get some kind of a job. I've never been without a job, but then their are people who are too good to dig ditches, roof houses, or do any of the umpteen other jobs I did before I got a degree. This country is in a mess, I sure don't see it getting any better for a long while. I just hope that one day if it ever comes down to it, that our military remembers that the oath they take is to protect the CONSTITUTION of the US, not the people in office.
 
Most Southern democrats that I am familiar with support an individuals right to own guns. Drug testing for welfare recipients would be expensive. Ofcourse their are many people leading a parasitic existence from well meaning social programs. My concern is for people who truly need these programs and children of deadbeat parents.
 
PELOSI IS EVIL! PELOSI IS EVIL! PELOSI IS EVIL! PELOSI IS EVIL! PELOSI IS EVIL! PELOSI IS EVIL!PELOSI IS EVIL! PELOSI IS EVIL! PELOSI IS EVIL! PELOSI IS EVIL! PELOSI IS EVIL! PELOSI IS EVIL! PELOSI IS EVIL! PELOSI IS EVIL! PELOSI IS EVIL! PELOSI IS EVIL! PELOSI IS EVIL! PELOSI IS EVIL! PELOSI IS EVIL! PELOSI IS EVIL! PELOSI IS EVIL! DO YOU UNDERSTAND?
 
Originally Posted By: HunterBear71Are you saying that Pelosi is evil? Like a general libby, you have to explain it all to them and repeat to no avail! What do you think hunterbear71? Tell me what you think? Explain your position on Pelosi, bleed your heart out for me. Give me her good points if any. I want to know what I'm missing that is so importantant that it might change my position on liberism! Just make a statement that will convince me to join the evil side.
tt2.gif
 
The first female Speaker of The House of Representatives, Pelosi has actually done some good works. Her legislative accomplishments include the toughest ethics reform legislation in the history of the congress, an increase in the minimum wage for the first time in 10 years, the largest college aid expansion since the GI bill, the largest increase in veterans healthcare funding in the history of the Veterans Administration, as well as a new GI education bill for veterans of Iraq and Afghanistan. Come on over to the evil side, Ozzy. We need you.
 
Originally Posted By: HunterBear71The first female Speaker of The House of Representatives, Pelosi has actually done some good works. Her legislative accomplishments include the toughest ethics reform legislation in the history of the congress, an increase in the minimum wage for the first time in 10 years, the largest college aid expansion since the GI bill, the largest increase in veterans healthcare funding in the history of the Veterans Administration, as well as a new GI education bill for veterans of Iraq and Afghanistan. Come on over to the evil side, Ozzy. We need you.

If you look at the current congress the ethics reform is a joke, right?
 
Originally Posted By: HunterBear71Most Southern democrats that I am familiar with support an individuals right to own guns. Drug testing for welfare recipients would be expensive. Ofcourse their are many people leading a parasitic existence from well meaning social programs. My concern is for people who truly need these programs and children of deadbeat parents.
No one is stopping you from giving to those people in need,
 
Back
Top