UPDATED! It's not dead yet - Arrogant imposter will be found out

/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/smiliesmack.gif /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/smiliesmack.gif BO is not a republican, so nothing will happen. /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/crazy.gif /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/crazy.gif /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/confused1.gif /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/confused1.gif /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/confused1.gif
 
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:


The media could make or break this thing. Being the media though it will probably be like you think, for naught. The media should be made to pay for this but with the democrats ability to censor the media I think we are screwed. Not looking forward to a crisis but that is about the only other solution as far as I can see.



You are right on the money , the media will say and do nothing !! Just like they did before the election !! And they will try to get the fairness doctrine going and shut down all the right wing talk shows ASAP .



Talk about a bunch of hypocrites, the Fairness Doctrine is nothing about being fair. Its sole purpose is to censor any opposing viewpoints of the Democrats. Just like their drive to do away with the 2nd Amendment they want to selectively hobble the 1st Amendment. The Democrats push to do away with 'Secret ballots' for workplace unionization is another A$$backwards push to a more socialist economy. They should be outlawed /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/smile.gif



If they have there way they will make this country as socialist as they can . The government with run everything .
 
Rimmy,
Seriously, with all due respect, you are very clearly a highly intelligent guy. So I have to repeat the question that it baffles me that--seemingly--you and other high IQ Obama supporters (and, yes, I know plenty of them, some are even relatives of mine...) do not seem to ever answer:

"Rimmy, et al: There is NO LEGITIMATE REASON to withhold something so minor, so WHY does he withhold it??!!


Wouldn't it just be easy and right to end all this speculation if he has nothing to conceal and he was in fact born in Hawaii? Hiding behind legalisms isn't the way to act honorably. Legal and honorable actions are NOT the same thing--there's what's RIGHT and it isn't necessarily the same as what's LEGAL. Lot's of immoral stuff is LEGAL, that is just the way it is in a (somewhat) free society. We have responsibility for our moral choices and can't hide behind legalisms.

If Sarah Palin were doing this, I'd be very disappointed so I do not think there is a double standard in play here at all. Had I supported Obama I'd be really disappointed that he is pulling this stuff.
 
Quote:
If Sarah Palin were doing this, I'd be very disappointed so I do not think there is a double standard in play here at all. Had I supported Obama I'd be really disappointed that he is pulling this stuff.


You mean like her medical records?
 
Quote:
Quote:
If Sarah Palin were doing this, I'd be very disappointed so I do not think there is a double standard in play here at all. Had I supported Obama I'd be really disappointed that he is pulling this stuff.


You mean like her medical records?



1. There you go again, you didn't answer the question at topic and instead posed another. OK, I'll bite...First, Sarah DID release medical information: She's just fine, thanks:

"...Republican vice-presidential candidate Sarah Palin’s health saying the governor is in “excellent health.”

The summary was in fact a two-page letter written by Palin’s Physician, Dr. Cathy Baldwin-Johnson reading that “Governor Palin is in excellent health and has no known health problems that would interfere with her ability to carry out the duties and obligation of Vice President of the United States of America.”

Dr. Baldwin-Johnson has been Palin’s doctor since 1997. Palin’s hospitalizations “have been related to routine women’s health care and pregnancy,” the doctor noted. The letter describes how Palin learned in the second trimester of her most recent pregnancy that her youngest son Trig had Down syndrome. She has other four children born in 1989, 1990, 1994 and 2000.

In 1992, Palin had a breast biopsy for a lesion that turned out to be benign. She is on no routine prescription medications and has no drug allergies either. Her vital signs are also normal with a blood pressure of 96/61 and a pulse of 77 at the time of her last office visit – though no date was given."

So, as you can all see, Trig Palin is REALLY Todd and Sarah's boy and not Bristol's...as has been speculated widely on hysterical, utterly mad Democrat blogs and forums.

2. No, Rimmy, Sarah's medical information is NOT like Obama's 1961 birth certificate (BTW, as I recall, Bill Clinton NEVER provided anything about his medical info).

Sarah would have been ELIGIBLE to be VP even if she'd lied about Trig. For the sake of argument, had she refused to provide medical info to conceal that then she'd have been avoiding EMBARASSMENT, whereas if Obama is concealing being INEGILIBLE to be POTUS then it is a quite different---much, much more serious--matter, IMO.

3. Finally, what really drives me nuts is that you KNOW this fact, yet play along. WHY? That part really puzzles me. /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/smiliesmack.gif
 
The information on the form that Obama posted is enough to prove citizenship. After it was released there were claims from unidentified sources that it is a forgery. So it was shown to a couple of groups that reported what they saw. After this there were claims that the groups were biased and could not be trusted. It has not been proven that their claims are false. Then there is the statement by the State of Hawaii and the finding of a birth announcement. No matter what Obama does outside of a court it will be questioned and denied by some. So much of this revolves around Berg’s claim that Obama was born in Kenya and I ask again what proof does Berg have to back up that claim?
 
Bottom line is no matter what nothing will be done about it anyway..No one in the government is going to push it. As far as they are concerned eveerything is fine.

Like I said before BO is not a republican, so nothing will happen, plain and simple. Also remember the Dems are in charge. We have the blind leading the blind, and we are all going to get the shaft in the end.
 
3. Finally, what really drives me nuts is that you KNOW this fact, yet play along. WHY? That part really puzzles me.

Could it be simply that they want to blame the government for all their problems and at the same time claim disability and food stamps and AFDC? I know 12 people who voted for bush both times.For no real reasons. Just blind button pushing. I asked them why after they voted for him,they shrugged and could not give me any answer at all.(Friends/loved ones) The same 12 are conspiracy nut jobs.The same 12 voted for Obama for no reason at all(other than thinking that he was going to up their welfare handout) But when I go to breakfast with them,they admit they feel it is right to scam disability and unemployment and they really don't believe their (own) conspiracy websites(when confronted privately).
I have come to believe it is all for personal attention they didn't receive as a child.And the fact that they admitted they don't believe it either.
They were not bright enough to do their own research or just begged to be spoon fed,over and over. And had to join a dumb dumb club to help them learn."Self esteem issues"?

And It seems they try to get good Americans to get nasty with them so they can win"and seem smarter" Which never really happens. I really believe they are afraid to admit they have made a grave error.So they will defend it "Knowing" they are looking stupid and foolish.
jerry
 
Last edited:
Back
Top